Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPaskins, Z
dc.contributor.authorCrawford-Manning, F
dc.contributor.authorCottrell, E
dc.contributor.authorCorp, N
dc.contributor.authorWright, J
dc.contributor.authorJinks, C
dc.contributor.authorBishop, S
dc.contributor.authorDoyle, A
dc.contributor.authorOng, T
dc.contributor.authorGittoes, N
dc.contributor.authorLeonardi-Bee, J
dc.contributor.authorLangley, T
dc.contributor.authorHorne, R
dc.contributor.authorSahota, O
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-18T14:28:59Z
dc.date.issued2020-11-03
dc.date.updated2022-07-18T12:45:48Z
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To explore the acceptability of different bisphosphonate regimens for the treatment of osteoporosis among patients, clinicians and managers, payers and academics. DESIGN: A systematic review of primary qualitative studies. Seven databases were searched from inception to July 2019. Screening, data extraction and quality assessment of full-articles selected for inclusion were performed independently by two authors. A framework synthesis was applied to extracted data based on the theoretical framework of acceptability (TFA). The TFA includes seven domains relating to sense-making, emotions, opportunity costs, burden, perceived effectiveness, ethicality and self-efficacy. Confidence in synthesis findings was assessed. SETTING: Any developed country healthcare setting. PARTICIPANTS: Patients, healthcare professionals, managers, payers and academics. INTERVENTION: Experiences and views of oral and intravenous bisphosphonates. RESULTS: Twenty-five studies were included, mostly describing perceptions of oral bisphosphonates. We identified, with high confidence, how patients and healthcare professionals make sense (coherence) of bisphosphonates by balancing perceptions of need against concerns, how uncertainty prevails about bisphosphonate perceived effectiveness and a number of individual and service factors that have potential to increase self-efficacy in recommending and adhering to bisphosphonates. We identified, with moderate confidence, that bisphosphonate taking induces concern, but has the potential to engender reassurance, and that both side effects and special instructions for taking oral bisphosphonates can result in treatment burden. Finally, we identified with low confidence that multimorbidity plays a role in people's perception of bisphosphonate acceptability. CONCLUSION: By using the lens of acceptability, our findings demonstrate with high confidence that a theoretically informed, whole-system approach is necessary to both understand and improve adherence. Clinicians and patients need supporting to understand the need for bisphosphonates, and clinicians need to clarify to patients what constitutes bisphosphonate treatment success. Further research is needed to explore perspectives of male patients and those with multimorbidity receiving bisphosphonates, and patients receiving intravenous treatment. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019143526.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute for Health Researchen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute for Health Researchen_GB
dc.format.extente040634-
dc.format.mediumElectronic
dc.identifier.citationVol. 10, No. 11, article e040634en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040634
dc.identifier.grantnumberHTA NIHR127550en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberCS-2018- 18-ST2-010en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/130291
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherBMJ Publishingen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33148763en_GB
dc.rights© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.en_GB
dc.subjectbone diseasesen_GB
dc.subjectmusculoskeletal disordersen_GB
dc.subjectrheumatologyen_GB
dc.titleAcceptability of bisphosphonates among patients, clinicians and managers: a systematic review and framework synthesis.en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2022-07-18T14:28:59Z
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
exeter.article-numberARTN e040634
exeter.place-of-publicationEngland
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available from BMJ Publishing via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.descriptionData availability statement: All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalBMJ Openen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofBMJ Open, 10(11)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-10-13
dc.rights.licenseCC BY
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-11-03
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2022-07-18T14:19:59Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2022-07-18T14:29:13Z
refterms.panelAen_GB
refterms.dateFirstOnline2020-11-03


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.