Cost-Effectiveness of an Online Intervention for Caregivers of People Living With Dementia
dc.contributor.author | Henderson, C | |
dc.contributor.author | Knapp, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Fossey, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Frangou, E | |
dc.contributor.author | Ballard, C | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-07-28T08:25:27Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-04-05 | |
dc.date.updated | 2022-07-27T16:03:20Z | |
dc.description.abstract | OBJECTIVES: Little evidence exists on costs or cost-effectiveness of online interventions for caregivers of people living with dementia. We aimed to assess cost-effectiveness of online cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for dementia caregivers with mild-to-moderate depression/anxiety, with or without telephone support, relative to a psychoeducational control treatment. DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness study of data from 3-armed randomized controlled trial comparing computerized CBT (cCBT) or telephone-supported cCBT (cCBT+Telephone) to modular online educational program on dementia (Psychoeducation). SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: UK-resident adult dementia caregivers with mild-to-moderate anxiety/depression. COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS: We calculated health and social care costs, from participant-reported data collected at baseline, 12, 26 weeks, costs of intervention delivery. We examined 3 outcomes: cost of one-point reduction in General Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12) rating at 26-weeks, cost of prevented "caseness" on GHQ-12 at 26 weeks, and cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) based on Short Form-6 Dimensions (SF-6D) over 26 weeks. RESULTS: Data from 176 participants (44 cCBT, 91 cCBT+Telephone, 41 Psychoeducation) were analyzed. Costs did not differ between cCBT and Psychoeducation; costs were £125 higher in cCBT+Telephone. Control and intervention groups did not differ on GHQ-12. Caseness was lower in cCBT+Telephone than Psychoeducation; cost of preventing a case was £610, and probability of cost-effectiveness on this outcome reached 98.5% at willingness to pay (WTP) of £12,900. Mean QALY did not differ between cCBT+Telephone and Psychoeducation. QALY gain in cCBT was 0.01 (95% CI 0.001, 0.021). Cost per QALY was £8130. Although base case probability of cost-effectiveness of cCBT was 93% at WTP-per-QALY of £27,600, sensitivity analyses suggested cCBT+Telephone was the more cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: We report preliminary evidence for adopting telephone-supported online CBT. This may be cost-effective in preventing a case of mental health disorder if, absent a societally accepted WTP threshold for this outcome, payers are willing to pay £12,900. Future research should investigate whether supported/unsupported online CBT improves health-related quality of life. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Alzheimer’s Society | en_GB |
dc.format.extent | S1525-8610(22)00208-0- | |
dc.format.medium | Print-Electronic | |
dc.identifier.citation | Published online 5 April 2022 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2022.03.002 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/130429 | |
dc.identifier | ORCID: 0000-0002-8533-3263 (Fossey, Jane) | |
dc.identifier | ScopusID: 7004743570 (Fossey, Jane) | |
dc.identifier | ORCID: 0000-0003-0022-5632 (Ballard, Clive) | |
dc.identifier | ScopusID: 35351371500 | 57200261353 | 57203270570 (Ballard, Clive) | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_GB |
dc.relation.url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35395216 | en_GB |
dc.rights | © 2022 AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine. Open access under a Creative Commons license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | en_GB |
dc.subject | Costs | en_GB |
dc.subject | cognitive-behavioral therapy | en_GB |
dc.subject | computerized interventions | en_GB |
dc.title | Cost-Effectiveness of an Online Intervention for Caregivers of People Living With Dementia | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2022-07-28T08:25:27Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1525-8610 | |
exeter.place-of-publication | United States | |
dc.description | This is the final version. Available on open access from Elsevier via the DOI in this record | en_GB |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1538-9375 | |
dc.identifier.journal | Journal of the American Medical Directors Association | en_GB |
dc.relation.ispartof | J Am Med Dir Assoc | |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2022-03-05 | |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2022-04-05 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2022-07-28T08:23:21Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | VoR | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2022-07-28T08:25:28Z | |
refterms.panel | A | en_GB |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2022 AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine. Open access under a Creative Commons license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/