Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorClare, L
dc.contributor.authorGamble, LD
dc.contributor.authorMartyr, A
dc.contributor.authorSabatini, S
dc.contributor.authorNelis, SM
dc.contributor.authorQuinn, C
dc.contributor.authorPentecost, C
dc.contributor.authorVictor, C
dc.contributor.authorJones, RW
dc.contributor.authorJones, IR
dc.contributor.authorKnapp, M
dc.contributor.authorLitherland, R
dc.contributor.authorMorris, RG
dc.contributor.authorRusted, JM
dc.contributor.authorThom, JM
dc.contributor.authorCollins, R
dc.contributor.authorHenderson, C
dc.contributor.authorMatthews, FE
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-25T10:33:03Z
dc.date.issued2022-02-03
dc.date.updated2022-08-25T09:50:24Z
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: We aimed to examine change over time in self-rated quality of life (QoL) in people with mild-to-moderate dementia and identify subgroups with distinct QoL trajectories. METHODS: We used data from people with mild-to-moderate dementia followed up at 12 and 24 months in the Improving the experience of Dementia and Enhancing Active Life (IDEAL) cohort study (baseline n = 1,537). A latent growth model approach examined mean change over time in QoL, assessed with the QoL-AD scale, and investigated associations of baseline demographic, cognitive, and psychological covariates with the intercept and slope of QoL. We employed growth mixture modeling to identify multiple growth trajectories. RESULTS: Overall mean QoL scores were stable and no associations with change over time were observed. Four classes of QoL trajectories were identified: 2 with higher baseline QoL scores, labeled Stable (74.9%) and Declining (7.6%), and 2 with lower baseline QoL scores, labeled Stable Lower (13.7%) and Improving (3.8%). The Declining class had higher baseline levels of depression and loneliness, and lower levels of self-esteem and optimism, than the Stable class. The Stable Lower class was characterized by disadvantage related to social structure, poor physical health, functional disability, and low psychological well-being. The Improving class was similar to the Stable Lower class but had lower cognitive test scores. DISCUSSION: Understanding individual trajectories can contribute to personalized care planning. Efforts to prevent decline in perceived QoL should primarily target psychological well-being. Efforts to improve QoL for those with poorer QoL should additionally address functional impairment, isolation, and disadvantage related to social structure.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEconomic and Social Research Council (ESRC)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipAlzheimer’s Societyen_GB
dc.format.extent1037-1050
dc.identifier.citationVol. 77(6), pp. 1037-1050en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbac022
dc.identifier.grantnumberES/L001853/2en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumber348, AS-PR2-16-001en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/130507
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-3740-5162 | 0000-0003-3989-5318 (Clare, Linda)
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-1702-8902 (Martyr, Anthony)
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-3618-6949 (Sabatini, Serena)
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0003-2048-5538 (Pentecost, Claire)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherOxford University Press (OUP) / Gerontological Society of Americaen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35134935en_GB
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_GB
dc.subjectAlzheimer’sen_GB
dc.subjectCaregiversen_GB
dc.subjectLongitudinalen_GB
dc.titleLongitudinal Trajectories of Quality of Life Among People With Mild-to-Moderate Dementia: A Latent Growth Model Approach With IDEAL Cohort Study Dataen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2022-08-25T10:33:03Z
dc.identifier.issn1079-5014
exeter.place-of-publicationUnited States
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Oxford University Press via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1758-5368
dc.identifier.journalThe Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciencesen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofJ Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci, 77(6)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dc.rights.licenseCC BY
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-02-03
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2022-08-25T10:30:19Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2022-08-25T10:33:21Z
refterms.panelAen_GB
refterms.dateFirstOnline2022-02-03


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.