dc.contributor.author | Kuthyar, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Watson, K | |
dc.contributor.author | Huang, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Brent, LJN | |
dc.contributor.author | Platt, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Horvath, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Gonzalez-Martinez, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Martínez, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Godoy-Vitorino, F | |
dc.contributor.author | Knight, R | |
dc.contributor.author | Dominguez-Bello, MG | |
dc.contributor.author | Amato, KR | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-09-06T13:25:57Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-09-01 | |
dc.date.updated | 2022-09-06T11:03:37Z | |
dc.description.abstract | Gut microbial communities are shaped by a myriad of extrinsic factors, including diet and the environment. Although distinct human populations consistently exhibit different gut microbiome compositions, variation in diet and environmental factors are almost always coupled, making it difficult to disentangle their relative contributions to shaping the gut microbiota. Data from discrete animal populations with similar diets can help reduce confounds. Here, we assessed the gut microbiota of free-ranging and captive rhesus macaques with at least 80% diet similarity to test the hypothesis that hosts in difference environments will have different gut microbiomes despite a shared diet. Although we found that location was a significant predictor of gut microbial composition, the magnitude of observed differences was relatively small. These patterns suggest that a shared diet may limit the typical influence of environmental microbial exposure on the gut microbiota. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | National Institutes of Health | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | C&D Fund | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Emch Fund | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Published online 1 September 2022 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiac098 | |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | 8-P40 OD012217-25 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | U42OD0211458 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | R01-MH096875 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | R01-MH089484 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | R01-MH118203 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/130707 | |
dc.identifier | ORCID: 0000-0002-1202-1939 (Brent, Lauren JN) | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) / Federation of European Microbiological Societies | en_GB |
dc.relation.url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36047944 | en_GB |
dc.rights.embargoreason | Under embargo until 1 September 2023 in compliance with publisher policy | en_GB |
dc.rights | © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of FEMS. | en_GB |
dc.subject | captivity | en_GB |
dc.subject | diet | en_GB |
dc.subject | microbiome | en_GB |
dc.subject | primate | en_GB |
dc.title | Limited microbiome differences in captive and semi-wild primate populations consuming similar diets | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2022-09-06T13:25:57Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0168-6496 | |
exeter.place-of-publication | England | |
dc.description | This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Oxford University Press via the DOI in this record | en_GB |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1574-6941 | |
dc.identifier.journal | FEMS Microbiology Ecology | en_GB |
dc.relation.ispartof | FEMS Microbiol Ecol | |
dc.rights.uri | http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved | en_GB |
rioxxterms.version | AM | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2022-09-01 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2022-09-06T13:21:04Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | AM | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2023-08-31T23:00:00Z | |
refterms.panel | A | en_GB |
refterms.dateFirstOnline | 2022-09-01 | |