Understanding surgical antimicrobial prescribing behaviour in the hospital setting: a systematic review and meta-ethnography protocol.
dc.contributor.author | Parker, H | |
dc.contributor.author | Frost, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Britten, N | |
dc.contributor.author | Robinson, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Mattick, K | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-09-16T14:01:06Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-10-10 | |
dc.date.updated | 2022-09-16T13:44:14Z | |
dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND: Surgical specialities use extensive amounts of antimicrobials, and misuse has been widely reported, making them a key target for antimicrobial stewardship initiatives. Interventions informed by, and tailored to, a clear understanding of the contextual barriers to appropriate antimicrobial use are more likely to successfully improve practice. However, this approach has been under utilised. Our aim is to synthesise qualitative studies on surgical antimicrobial prescribing behaviour (APB) in hospital settings to explain how and why contextual factors act and interact to influence APB amongst surgical teams. We will develop new theory to advance understanding and identify knowledge gaps to inform further research. METHODS: The meta-ethnography will follow the seven-phase method described by Noblit and Hare. We will conduct a comprehensive search using eight databases (AMED, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, MEDLINE-in-process, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and PsycINFO) with no date restrictions; forwards and backwards citation searches; and contacting first authors of relevant papers. Studies will be dual screened and included if they use recognised qualitative methods and analysis; focus on contextual factors associated with surgical APB within hospital settings; are available in full in English; and are relevant to the research question. Any disagreements between reviewers will be resolved through discussion to reach consensus. Included studies will be read repeatedly to illuminate key concepts and the relationship between key concepts across studies. Then, key concepts will be sorted into conceptual categories or 'piles' which will be further abstracted to form a conceptual framework explaining surgical APB. During the synthesis, emerging interpretations will be discussed with stakeholders (including authors of included studies where possible; surgical and stewardship practitioners; and patient representatives) to ensure new knowledge is meaningful. DISCUSSION: This research has several strengths: (1) the protocol has been written with reference to established guidance maximising rigour and transparency; (2) the multi-disciplinary research team bring varied interpretative repertoires and relevant methodological skills; and (3) stakeholders will be involved to ensure that findings are relevant, and disseminated via suitable channels, to support improved patient care. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020184343. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Health Education England/National Institute for Health Research | en_GB |
dc.format.extent | 236- | |
dc.format.medium | Electronic | |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 9, No. 1, article 236 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01477-5 | |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | CDRF-2018-04-ST2-019 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/130870 | |
dc.identifier | ORCID: 0000-0002-3503-5911 (Frost, Julia) | |
dc.identifier | ScopusID: 8856263500 (Frost, Julia) | |
dc.identifier | ORCID: 0000-0002-7533-414X (Britten, Nicky) | |
dc.identifier | ORCID: 0000-0003-1800-773X (Mattick, Karen) | |
dc.identifier | ScopusID: 56723888400 | 57130622400 | 6701773218 (Mattick, Karen) | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | BMC | en_GB |
dc.relation.url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33038928 | en_GB |
dc.rights | © The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. | en_GB |
dc.subject | Antimicrobial decision-making | en_GB |
dc.subject | Antimicrobial prescribing behaviour | en_GB |
dc.subject | Meta-ethnography | en_GB |
dc.subject | Qualitative | en_GB |
dc.subject | Surgery | en_GB |
dc.subject | Synthesis | en_GB |
dc.title | Understanding surgical antimicrobial prescribing behaviour in the hospital setting: a systematic review and meta-ethnography protocol. | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2022-09-16T14:01:06Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2046-4053 | |
exeter.article-number | 236 | |
exeter.place-of-publication | England | |
dc.description | This is the final version. Available from BMC via the DOI in this record. | en_GB |
dc.description | Availability of data and materials: Not applicable. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | Systematic Reviews | en_GB |
dc.relation.ispartof | Syst Rev, 9(1) | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2020-09-08 | |
dc.rights.license | CC BY | |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2020-10-10 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2022-09-16T13:59:13Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | VoR | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2022-09-16T14:01:11Z | |
refterms.panel | A | en_GB |
refterms.dateFirstOnline | 2020-10-10 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License,
which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give
appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if
changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons
licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons
licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain
permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the
data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.