Biologisms on the left and the right
dc.contributor.author | Richardson, A | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-09-30T08:22:32Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-08-15 | |
dc.date.updated | 2022-09-29T17:46:37Z | |
dc.description.abstract | Victorian Britain saw the rise of biologism, the practice of attributing biological cause to that which is explicable either wholly or in part by environment. Its most extreme expression was eugenics, first disseminated by Galton through Macmillan’s Magazine in 1865. I explore early British eugenics as a biologistic discourse centred on class which took aim primarily at the “residuum”, or “submerged tenth”, the section of the working class alleged to be least productive. It was framed by racism, the biologism on which much late-Victorian imperialism was based. I consider ways in which biologisms inform distinct twenty-first-century discourse and practice, from policies around child benefit to Covid19, and focus on one thread of biologistic thought as it extends to debates on gender identity–the idea that gender is both a feeling but also innate and brain-based. I conclude that gender identity theory risks, however inadvertently, reinscribing biologistic ideas and stereotypes. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Leverhulme Trust | en_GB |
dc.format.extent | 2496-2518 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 45, No. 13, pp. 2496-2518 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2022.2102933 | |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | RF-2022-572 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/131040 | |
dc.identifier | ORCID: 0000-0002-9847-3564 (Richardson, Angelique) | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Routledge | en_GB |
dc.rights | © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. | en_GB |
dc.subject | Imperialism | en_GB |
dc.subject | biologism | en_GB |
dc.subject | stereotypes | en_GB |
dc.subject | gender identity | en_GB |
dc.subject | neoliberalism | en_GB |
dc.title | Biologisms on the left and the right | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2022-09-30T08:22:32Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0141-9870 | |
dc.description | This is the final version. Available from Routledge via the DOI in this record. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1466-4356 | |
dc.identifier.journal | Ethnic and Racial Studies | en_GB |
dc.relation.ispartof | Ethnic and Racial Studies, 45(13) | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2022-06-28 | |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2022-08-15 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2022-09-30T08:20:03Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | VoR | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2022-09-30T08:23:27Z | |
refterms.panel | D | en_GB |
refterms.dateFirstOnline | 2022-08-15 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.