Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorParker, TC
dc.contributor.authorChomel, M
dc.contributor.authorClemmensen, KE
dc.contributor.authorFriggens, NL
dc.contributor.authorHartley, IP
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, D
dc.contributor.authorKater, I
dc.contributor.authorKrab, EJ
dc.contributor.authorLindahl, BD
dc.contributor.authorStreet, LE
dc.contributor.authorSubke, J
dc.contributor.authorWookey, PA
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-10T14:00:06Z
dc.date.issued2022-09-16
dc.date.updated2022-10-10T12:35:47Z
dc.description.abstractThe supply of recent photosynthate from plants to soils is thought to be a critical mechanism regulating the activity and diversity of soil biota. In the Arctic, large-scale vegetation transitions are underway in response to warming, and there is an urgent need to understand how these changes affect soil biodiversity and function. We investigated how abundance and diversity of soil fungi and invertebrates responded to a reduction in fresh belowground photosynthate supply in treeline birch and willow, achieved using stem girdling. We hypothesised that birch forest would support greater abundance of ectomycorrhizal fungal species and fauna than willow shrubs, and that girdling would result in a rapid switch from ectomycorrhizal fungi to saprotrophs as canopy-supply of C was cut, with a concomitant decline in soil fauna. Birch forest had greater fungal and faunal abundance with a large contribution of root-associated ascomycetes (ericoid mycorrhizal fungi and root endophytes) compared to willow shrub plots, which had a higher proportion of saprotrophs and, contrary to our expectations, ectomycorrhizal fungi. Broad-scale soil fungal and faunal functional group composition was not significantly changed by girdling, even in the third year of treatment. Within the ectomycorrhizal community, there were some changes, with genera that are believed to be particularly C-demanding declining in girdled plots. However, it was notable how most ectomycorrhizal fungi remained present after three years’ isolation of the belowground compartment from contemporary photosynthate supply. Synthesis: In a treeline/tundra ecosystem, distinct soil communities existed in contrasting vegetation patches within the landscape, but the structure of these communities was resistant to canopy disturbance and concomitant reduction of autotrophic C inputs.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNatural Environment Research Councilen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNatural Environment Research Councilen_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 16 September 2022en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13994
dc.identifier.grantnumberNE/P002722/1en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberNE/P002722/2en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/131181
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-9183-6617 (Hartley, Iain P)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWiley / British Ecological Societyen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA846260/en_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.5285/d6c787ec-146c-461b-b8a2-e0251259036cen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.5285/4418c631-c39c-467c-b3b8-c75142fcae0aen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.5285/d3c98f24-7a4d-40b8-989a-6cc340e91cacen_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder embargo until 16 September 2023 in compliance with publisher policyen_GB
dc.rights© 2022 British Ecological Societyen_GB
dc.titleResistance of subarctic soil fungal and invertebrate communities to disruption of belowground carbon supplyen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2022-10-10T14:00:06Z
dc.identifier.issn0022-0477
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Wiley via the DOI in this record en_GB
dc.descriptionData Availability Statement: All sequence data is stored at NCBI-SRA at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA846260/. ITS copy numbers and species hypothesis relative abundance data are available at https://doi.org/10.5285/d6c787ec-146c-461b-b8a2-e0251259036c. Flux, hyphae and root data are available at https://doi.org/10.5285/4418c631-c39c-467c-b3b8-c75142fcae0a, soil fauna data are available at https://doi.org/10.5285/d3c98f24-7a4d-40b8-989a-6cc340e91cac.en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1365-2745
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Ecologyen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Ecology
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-08-30
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-09-16
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2022-10-10T13:53:37Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2023-09-15T23:00:00Z
refterms.panelCen_GB
refterms.dateFirstOnline2022-09-16


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record