Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAnic, V
dc.contributor.authorGaston, KJ
dc.contributor.authorDavies, TW
dc.contributor.authorBennie, J
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-17T10:24:32Z
dc.date.issued2022-08-04
dc.date.updated2022-10-16T20:06:50Z
dc.description.abstractThe introduction of artificial nighttime lighting due to human settlements and transport networks is increasingly altering the timing, intensity, and spectra of natural light regimes worldwide. Much of the research on the impacts of nighttime light pollution on organisms has focused on animal species. Little is known about the impacts of daylength extension due to outdoor lighting technologies on wild plant communities, despite the fact that plant growth and development are under photoperiodic control. In a five-year field experiment, artificial ecosystems ("mesocosms") of grassland communities both alone or in combination with invertebrate herbivores and predators were exposed to light treatments that simulated street lighting technologies (low-pressure sodium, and light-emitting diode [LED]-based white lighting), at ground-level illuminance. Most of the plant species in the mesocosms did not exhibit changes in biomass accumulation after 5 years of exposure to the light treatments. However, the white LED treatment had a significant negative effect on biomass production in the herbaceous species Lotus pedunculatus. Likewise, the interaction between the white LED treatment and the presence of herbivores significantly reduced the mean shoot/root ratio of the grass species Holcus lanatus. Artificial nighttime lighting had no effect on the foliar carbon or nitrogen in most of the grassland species. Nevertheless, the white LED treatment significantly increased the leaf nitrogen content in Lotus corniculatus in the presence of herbivores. Long-term exposure to artificial light at night had no general effects on plant biomass responses in experimental grassland communities. However, species-specific and negative effects of cool white LED lighting at ground-level illuminance on biomass production and allocation in mixed plant communities are suggested by our findings. Further studies on the impacts of light pollution on biomass accumulation in plant communities are required as these effects could be mediated by different factors, including herbivory, competition, and soil nutrient availability.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Union FP7en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipCONICYT-CHILE PhD Scholarshipen_GB
dc.format.extente9157-
dc.format.mediumElectronic-eCollection
dc.identifier.citationVol. 12(8), article e9157en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9157
dc.identifier.grantnumber268504en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/131291
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0003-4394-2041 (Bennie, Jonathan)
dc.identifierScopusID: 24337227400 (Bennie, Jonathan)
dc.identifierResearcherID: A-6526-2010 (Bennie, Jonathan)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWileyen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35949540en_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.20304039en_GB
dc.rights© 2022 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_GB
dc.subjectartificial nighttime lightingen_GB
dc.subjectbiomass allocationen_GB
dc.subjectfoliar nitrogenen_GB
dc.subjectgrassland communitiesen_GB
dc.subjectinvertebrate herbivoresen_GB
dc.subjectplant biomassen_GB
dc.titleLong-term effects of artificial nighttime lighting and trophic complexity on plant biomass and foliar carbon and nitrogen in a grassland community.en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2022-10-17T10:24:32Z
dc.identifier.issn2045-7758
exeter.article-numberARTN e9157
exeter.place-of-publicationEngland
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Wiley via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionData availability statement: The datasets presented in this paper are available in the Figshare data repository with the identifier https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.20304039en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn2045-7758
dc.identifier.journalEcology and Evolutionen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofEcol Evol, 12(8)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-07-05
dc.rights.licenseCC BY
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-08-04
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2022-10-17T10:22:24Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2022-10-17T10:24:39Z
refterms.panelBen_GB
refterms.dateFirstOnline2022-08-04


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2022 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium,
provided the original work is properly cited.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2022 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.