Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSoutar, I
dc.contributor.authorDevine-Wright, P
dc.contributor.authorRohse, M
dc.contributor.authorWalker, C
dc.contributor.authorGooding, L
dc.contributor.authorDevine-Wright, H
dc.contributor.authorKay, I
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-18T08:26:02Z
dc.date.issued2022-10-17
dc.date.updated2022-10-17T19:28:52Z
dc.description.abstractEnergy transitions require engagement with users, local communities and wider publics in order to be fair, acceptable and, ultimately, successful. Here we focus on the development of decentralised energy systems instigated by central government. Smart Local Energy Systems (SLES), involving low carbon generation, demand sources and smart technologies in a geographically-bounded location, are important but unexplored contexts for public engagement. Drawing on 23 interviews with partner organisations in 12 UK SLES projects, we investigate the targets, methods and rationales of engagement. Partners engage a range of user and community groups around multiple energy system components using a variety of methods, directly and via intermediary organisations. Project size is not a major influence on breadth and intensity of engagement. Project partners rationalise practices with reference to characterisations of users and engagement, and practices are conditioned by a range of factors (e.g. technological boundaries, place, partners involved, and the wider organisational context within which SLES projects take place). We highlight a need for future SLES policy to emphasise engagement as a key facet, institute systematic social learning between SLES projects, and consider how to engage publics beyond the boundaries of individual projects.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipScience Foundation Ireland (SFI)en_GB
dc.format.extent113279-113279
dc.identifier.citationVol. 171, article 113279en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113279
dc.identifier.grantnumberEP/S031863/1en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumber16/SP/3804en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumber13/RC/2077en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/131299
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0001-8291-9878 (Soutar, Iain)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevieren_GB
dc.rights© 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_GB
dc.subjectEngagementen_GB
dc.subjectParticipationen_GB
dc.subjectEnergy transitionsen_GB
dc.subjectDecentralisationen_GB
dc.subjectPolicyen_GB
dc.subjectPublicen_GB
dc.titleConstructing practices of engagement with users and communities: Comparing emergent state-led smart local energy systemsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2022-10-18T08:26:02Z
dc.identifier.issn0301-4215
exeter.article-number113279
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Elsevier via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionData availability: The data that has been used is confidential.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalEnergy Policyen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofEnergy Policy, 171
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-09-25
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-10-17
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2022-10-18T08:23:38Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2022-10-18T08:26:44Z
refterms.panelCen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).