Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFirkins, JME
dc.contributor.authorKelley, LA
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-20T09:53:07Z
dc.date.issued2022-11-09
dc.date.updated2022-10-20T09:17:33Z
dc.description.abstractMany animals use shading to infer the three-dimensional (3D) shape of objects, and mimicking natural shading patterns can produce the illusion of 3D form on a flat surface. Over 150 years ago, Charles Darwin noted that the ocelli (‘eyespots’) on the feathers of the great argus Argusianus argus, when held vertically during courtship displays to females, were perfectly shaded to resemble 3D hemispheres to human viewers. We tested whether these ocelli appear 3D to birds by training chickens Gallus gallus domesticus to select images of either convex or concave shapes using shading cues, and then presenting them with images of great argus ocelli. Chickens successfully learned how to discriminate between convex and concave shapes, and treated the great argus pheasant ocelli in the same way as convex training stimuli. Our findings are consistent with previous studies that birds can perceive 3D shape from shading cues in a similar manner to humans. The perception of great argus ocelli as consistent with 3D shape by avian viewers suggests that shape illusions can play a role in male courtship.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipRoyal Societyen_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 18 (11), article 20220393en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1098/rsbl.2022.0393
dc.identifier.grantnumberDH160082en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/131344
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0003-0700-1471 (Kelley, Laura)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherRoyal Societyen_GB
dc.rights© 2022 The Authors. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
dc.titleDoes shading on great argus Argusianus argus feathers create a 3D illusion?en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2022-10-20T09:53:07Z
dc.identifier.issn1744-957X
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from the Royal Society via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionData accessibility: All data are provided in the electronic supplementary materials.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalBiology Lettersen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-10-20
dcterms.dateSubmitted2022-08-25
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-10-20
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2022-10-20T09:17:35Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2022-12-01T14:53:27Z
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2022 The Authors.

Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2022 The Authors. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.