"Overturning the Majority?" The Insurgent Minorities and the Self-Questioning of Society
Karoutas, A
Date: 31 October 2022
Thesis or dissertation
Publisher
University of Exeter
Degree Title
PhD in Politics
Abstract
This dissertation addresses the problem of how insurgent minorities can be democratic actors. This dissertation re-thematises the focus of a democratic, reconfigurative politics – by exploring the subject of insurgent minorities that instigate the self-questioning of society. I borrow and re-frame the Tardian process through which the ...
This dissertation addresses the problem of how insurgent minorities can be democratic actors. This dissertation re-thematises the focus of a democratic, reconfigurative politics – by exploring the subject of insurgent minorities that instigate the self-questioning of society. I borrow and re-frame the Tardian process through which the minority ‘overturns’ the majority, by seeking to identify how such a process could be democratic – or, how groups that seek the re-configuration of society could be understood as democratic actors. I turn my attention to critical theories of democracy and post-Marxism. Uncovering the democratic potential of insurgent minorities, I develop an account of the democratic role minorities play in instigating a process of societal self-questioning. To derive and expand upon the democratic role and nature of insurgent minorities, I engage with the work of three post-Marxist thinkers, who are the focus of this study: Ernesto Laclau, Gilles Deleuze, and Jacques Rancière. I present three different accounts of the process of ‘overturning’, through which an insurgent minority may instigate the process of societal self-questioning. Through each of the thinkers, I derive a different understanding of what insurgent minorities seek to overturn; as well as a different primary focus on how this is achieved. Specifically, I explore the ‘overturning’ of the ‘hegemony’ through the equivalential logic in Laclau; the overturning of ‘arborescence’ through a ‘symplegmatic’ double-becoming in Deleuze; and the overturning of the ‘police’ through subjectivation in Rancière. As I explore, a core challenge and task of this dissertation is to establish the sense in which overturning a majority can be democratic. Drawing upon Cornelius Castoriadis, I posit that the defining criterion that establishes whether an insurgent minority is democratic relates to the process of societal self-questioning, and whether said group strives towards the closure or opening of future prospects for self-questioning. In each of the three thinkers explored, I expand upon how insurgent minorities bring about this self-questioning. In Laclau, I discuss the idea of a ‘democratic’ counter-hegemonic politics; in Deleuze, I address the inherent anti-fascistic approach which should guide insurgent minorities; and, in Rancière, I focus on the axiom of the presupposition of equality which sets apart insurgent minorities as democratic actors vis-à-vis other kinds of minorities engaged in other kinds of antagonistic politics. In doing so, I expand our theoretical accounts of democratic theory, expand post-Marxist critique, and deepen our understanding of the important democratic role minorities have in democratic societies.
Doctoral Theses
Doctoral College
Item views 0
Full item downloads 0