Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJones, L
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, S
dc.contributor.authorLæssøe, J
dc.contributor.authorBanzhaf, E
dc.contributor.authorJensen, A
dc.contributor.authorBird, DN
dc.contributor.authorMiller, J
dc.contributor.authorHutchins, MG
dc.contributor.authorYang, J
dc.contributor.authorGarrett, J
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, T
dc.contributor.authorWheeler, BW
dc.contributor.authorLovell, R
dc.contributor.authorFletcher, D
dc.contributor.authorQu, Y
dc.contributor.authorVieno, M
dc.contributor.authorZandersen, M
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-16T10:46:13Z
dc.date.issued2022-11-15
dc.date.updated2022-11-16T10:28:53Z
dc.description.abstractUrban Green Infrastructure (GI) provides multiple benefits to city inhabitants and can be an important component in nature-based solutions (NBS), but the ecosystem services that underpin those benefits are inconsistently quantified in the literature. There remain substantial knowledge gaps about the level of service supported by less studied GI types, e.g. cemeteries, or less-studied ecosystem services, e.g. noise mitigation. Decision-makers and planners in cities often face conflicting or incomplete information on the effectiveness of GI, particularly on their ability to provide a suite of co-benefits. Here, we describe a feature-based typology of GI which combines elements of land cover, land use and both ecological and social function. It is consistent with user requirements on mapping, and with the needs of models which can conduct more detailed ecosystem service assessments which can guide NBS design. We provide an evidence synthesis based on published literature, which scores the ability of each GI type to deliver a suite of ecosystem services. In the multivariate analysis of the typology scores, the main axis of variation differentiates between constructed (or hybrid) GI types designed primarily for water flow management (delivering relatively few services) and more natural green GI with trees, or blue GI such as lakes and the sea, which deliver a more multi-functional set of regulating services. The most multi-functional GI on this axis also score highest for biodiversity. The second element of variation separates those GI which support very few cultural services and those which score highly in enabling physical wellbeing and social interaction and, to a lesser extent, restoring capacities. Together the typology and multi-functionality matrix provide a much needed assessment for less studied GI types, and allow planners and decision-makers to make a-priori assessments of the relative ability of different GI as part of NBS to address urban challenges.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Commissionen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipMinistry of Science and Technology of Chinaen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNatural Environment Research Council (NERC)en_GB
dc.format.extent100041-100041
dc.identifier.citationArticle 100041en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbsj.2022.100041
dc.identifier.grantnumber821016en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumber2021YFE93100en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberNE/R016429/1en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/131789
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0001-9404-5936 (Wheeler, Benedict W)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevieren_GB
dc.rights© 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)en_GB
dc.subjectgreen and blue spaceen_GB
dc.subjectcitiesen_GB
dc.subjectecosystem servicesen_GB
dc.subjectcultural servicesen_GB
dc.subjectwellbeingen_GB
dc.titleA typology for urban Green Infrastructure, to guide multifunctional planning of nature-based solutionsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2022-11-16T10:46:13Z
dc.identifier.issn2772-4115
exeter.article-number100041
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available on open access from Elsevier via the DOI in this record en_GB
dc.descriptionData Availability: No data was used for the research described in the article.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalNature-Based Solutionsen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-11-13
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-11-15
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2022-11-16T10:41:57Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2022-11-16T10:46:19Z
refterms.panelAen_GB
refterms.dateFirstOnline2022-11-15


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)