Economic evaluation of a small wastewater treatment plant under different design and operation scenarios by life cycle costing
Pryce, D; Kapelan, Z; Memon, FA
Date: 17 November 2022
Article
Journal
Development Engineering
Publisher
Elsevier
Publisher DOI
Abstract
High-performance wastewater treatment technologies suited to the urban environment remain largely inaccessible to developing countries due to financial constraints. Instead, inadequate technologies are being used that
adversely affect the quality of water resources and limit their sustainability. One high performing technology ...
High-performance wastewater treatment technologies suited to the urban environment remain largely inaccessible to developing countries due to financial constraints. Instead, inadequate technologies are being used that
adversely affect the quality of water resources and limit their sustainability. One high performing technology that
offers possible solution is a packaged version of the integrated fixed-film activated sludge (IFAS) system consisting of a 20 m3 aerobic reactor and a 4.2 m3 settlement tank. The present work has investigated aspects of this
typically-expensive solution that can be economized to improve its uptake in these countries. To achieve this a
life cycle cost analysis (LCCA) was performed and potential savings identified. The results obtained show that the
life cycle cost is $0.31/m3 and that costs primarily occurred at the construction stage (11.9%) and the operation
and maintenance stage (88.1%) with negligible disposal costs. A reduction of up to 42.4% in construction costs
were shown to be accessible by adopting other materials such as high-density polyethylene (HDPE) or to a lesser
extent glass-fibre reinforced polymer (GFRP). The greatest single cost in the life cycle was found to be incurred by
aeration (48.9%), requiring expenditure of $0.15/m3
, however the use of intermittent aeration (IA) could reduce
this further to $0.08/m3
. Further work is suggested to investigate the broader sustainability of the different
aeration strategies in light of these economic results.
Engineering
Faculty of Environment, Science and Economy
Item views 0
Full item downloads 0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).