Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBarreto, M
dc.contributor.authorDoyle, DM
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-18T12:58:21Z
dc.date.issued2022-12-02
dc.date.updated2022-11-18T12:06:01Z
dc.description.abstractTheory and research on ambivalent sexism—which encompasses both attitudes that are overtly negative (hostile sexism) and those that seem subjectively positive but are actually harmful (benevolent sexism)—has made substantial contributions to understanding how sexism operates and the consequences it has for women. It is now clear that sexism takes different forms, some of which can be disguised as protection and flattery. However, all forms of sexism have negative effects on how women are perceived and treated by others as well as on women themselves. Some of these findings have implications for understanding other social inequalities, such as ableism, ageism, racism, and classism. In this Review, we summarize what is known about the predictors of ambivalent sexism and its effects. Although we focus on women we also consider some effects on men, in particular those that indirectly impact women. Throughout the Review we point to societal shifts that are likely to impact how sexism is manifested, experienced, and understood. We conclude by discussing the broader implications of these changes and specifying areas of enquiry that need to be addressed to continue making progress in understanding the mechanisms underlying social inequalities.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 2 December 2022en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00136-x
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/131811
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-6973-7233 (Barreto, Manuela)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherNature Researchen_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder embargo until 2 June 2023 in compliance with publisher policyen_GB
dc.rights© Crown 2022
dc.titleBenevolent and hostile sexism in a shifting global contexten_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2022-11-18T12:58:21Z
dc.identifier.issn2731-0574
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Nature Research via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalNature Reviews Psychologyen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofNature Reviews Psychology
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-11-01
dcterms.dateSubmitted2022-01-03
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-11-01
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2022-11-18T12:06:04Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record