Synthesizing the evidence of nitrous oxide mitigation practices in agroecosystems
dc.contributor.author | Grados, D | |
dc.contributor.author | Butterbach-Bahl, K | |
dc.contributor.author | Chen, J | |
dc.contributor.author | van Groenigen, KJ | |
dc.contributor.author | Olesen, JE | |
dc.contributor.author | van Groenigen, JW | |
dc.contributor.author | Abalos, D | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-11-30T09:00:44Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-10-31 | |
dc.date.updated | 2022-11-29T15:37:07Z | |
dc.description.abstract | Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from agricultural soils are the main source of atmospheric N2O, a potent greenhouse gas and key ozone-depleting substance. Several agricultural practices with potential to mitigate N2O emissions have been tested worldwide. However, to guide policymaking for reducing N2O emissions from agricultural soils, it is necessary to better understand the overall performance and variability of mitigation practices and identify those requiring further investigation. We performed a systematic review and a second-order meta-analysis to assess the abatement efficiency of N2O mitigation practices from agricultural soils. We used 27 meta-analyses including 41 effect sizes based on 1119 primary studies. Technology-driven solutions (e.g. enhanced-efficiency fertilizers, drip irrigation, and biochar) and optimization of fertilizer rate have considerable mitigation potential. Agroecological mitigation practices (e.g. organic fertilizer and reduced tillage), while potentially contributing to soil quality and carbon storage, may enhance N2O emissions and only lead to reductions under certain pedoclimatic and farming conditions. Other mitigation practices (e.g. lime amendment or crop residue removal) led to marginal N2O decreases. Despite the variable mitigation potential, evidencing the context-dependency of N2O reductions and tradeoffs, several mitigation practices may maintain or increase crop production, representing relevant alternatives for policymaking to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and safeguard food security. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Danish Council for Independent Research | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Danish Council for Independent Research | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | EU H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions | en_GB |
dc.format.extent | 114024- | |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 17, No. 11, article 114024 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac9b50 | |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | 9041-00324B | en_GB |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | 1051-00060B | en_GB |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | 839806 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/131886 | |
dc.identifier | ORCID: 0000-0002-9165-3925 (van Groenigen, Kees Jan) | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | IOP Publishing | en_GB |
dc.relation.url | https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/2fjhw | en_GB |
dc.rights | © 2022 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd. Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI. | en_GB |
dc.subject | agricultural soils | en_GB |
dc.subject | nitrous oxide | en_GB |
dc.subject | greenhouse gas | en_GB |
dc.subject | mitigation | en_GB |
dc.subject | evidence synthesis | en_GB |
dc.subject | meta-analysis | en_GB |
dc.title | Synthesizing the evidence of nitrous oxide mitigation practices in agroecosystems | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2022-11-30T09:00:44Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1748-9318 | |
exeter.article-number | ARTN 114024 | |
dc.description | This is the final version. Available from IOP Publishing via the DOI in this record. | en_GB |
dc.description | Data availability statement: The data that support the findings of this study are openly available at the following URL/DOI: https:// doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/2fjhw. | en_GB |
dc.description | Code availability statement: The code to reproduce the findings of this study is openly available at the following URL/DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/2fjhw. The synthesized data after curation is provided (Supplementary data). | en_GB |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1748-9326 | |
dc.identifier.journal | Environmental Research Letters | en_GB |
dc.relation.ispartof | Environmental Research Letters, 17(11) | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2022-10-18 | |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2022-10-31 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2022-11-30T08:56:18Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | VoR | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2022-11-30T09:00:47Z | |
refterms.panel | C | en_GB |
refterms.dateFirstOnline | 2022-10-31 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2022 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd. Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.