Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMooney, A
dc.contributor.authorTeare, JA
dc.contributor.authorStaerk, J
dc.contributor.authorSmeele, SQ
dc.contributor.authorRose, P
dc.contributor.authorEdell, RH
dc.contributor.authorKing, CE
dc.contributor.authorConrad, L
dc.contributor.authorBuckley, YM
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-17T14:01:53Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-15
dc.date.updated2023-01-17T12:06:42Z
dc.description.abstractAs global wildlife populations continue to decline, the health and sustainability of ex situ populations in zoos and aquariums have become increasingly important. However, the majority of managed ex situ populations are not meeting sustainability criteria and are not viable in the long term. Historically, ex situ flamingo (Phoenicopteriformes) populations have shown low rates of reproductive success and improvements are needed for long-term viability. Both flock size and environmental suitability have previously been shown to be important determinants of ex situ flamingo reproductive success in a limited number of sites in some species. Here we combined current and historic globally shared zoological records for four of the six extant species of flamingo (Phoeniconaias minor, Phoenicopterus chilensis, Phoenicopterus roseus, and Phoenicopterus ruber) to analyze how flock size, structure, and climatic variables have influenced reproductive success in ex situ flamingo populations at 540 zoological institutions from 1990 to 2019. Flock size had a strong nonlinear relationship with reproductive success for all species, with flock sizes of 41–100 birds necessary to achieve ca. 50% probability of reproduction. Additionally, an even sex ratio and the introduction of new individuals to a flock both increased ex situ reproductive success in some cases, while climatic variables played a limited role. We demonstrate the conservation management potential from globally shared zoological data and provide species-specific management recommendations to increase the reproductive success of global ex situ flamingo populations: minimum flock sizes should be increased, and we encourage greater collaboration between individual institutions and regional associations in exchanging birds between flocks.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipIrish Research Councilen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipInternational Max Planck Research School for Organismal Biologyen_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 15 January 2023en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.21753
dc.identifier.grantnumberIRCLA/2017/60en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/132255
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-5375-8267 (Rose, Paul)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWileyen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7504076en_GB
dc.rights© 2023 The Authors. Zoo Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.en_GB
dc.subjectconservationen_GB
dc.subjectdataen_GB
dc.subjectmanagementen_GB
dc.subjectpopulationen_GB
dc.subjectsustainabilityen_GB
dc.titleFlock size and structure influence reproductive success in four species of flamingo in 540 captive populations worldwideen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2023-01-17T14:01:53Z
dc.identifier.issn0733-3188
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Wiley via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionData availability statement: Anonymized data files for each species, and associated metadata, are available from https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7504076. In line with the FAIR data principles, the data are made available under the following license: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1098-2361
dc.identifier.journalZoo Biologyen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofZoo Biology
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-12-06
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2023-01-17T13:59:57Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2023-01-17T14:02:01Z
refterms.panelAen_GB
refterms.dateFirstOnline2023-01-15


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2023 The Authors. Zoo Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2023 The Authors. Zoo Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.