Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorByng, R
dc.contributor.authorCreanor, S
dc.contributor.authorJones, B
dc.contributor.authorHosking, J
dc.contributor.authorPlappert, H
dc.contributor.authorBevan, S
dc.contributor.authorBritten, N
dc.contributor.authorClark, M
dc.contributor.authorDavies, L
dc.contributor.authorFrost, J
dc.contributor.authorGask, L
dc.contributor.authorGibbons, B
dc.contributor.authorGibson, J
dc.contributor.authorHardy, P
dc.contributor.authorHobson-Merrett, C
dc.contributor.authorHuxley, P
dc.contributor.authorJeffery, A
dc.contributor.authorMarwaha, S
dc.contributor.authorRawcliffe, T
dc.contributor.authorReilly, S
dc.contributor.authorRichards, D
dc.contributor.authorSayers, R
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, L
dc.contributor.authorPinfold, V
dc.contributor.authorBirchwood, M
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-14T09:13:41Z
dc.date.issued2023-04-20
dc.date.updated2023-02-13T17:53:38Z
dc.description.abstractBackground Individuals living with severe mental illness can have significant emotional, physical and social challenges. Collaborative Care combines clinical and organisational components. Aim We tested whether a primary care-based Collaborative Care model (PARTNERS) would improve quality of life for people with diagnoses of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder or other psychoses compared to usual care. Methods A general practice-based cluster randomised controlled superiority trial (ISRCTN 95702682). Practices were recruited from four English regions and allocated (1:1) to intervention or control. Individuals receiving limited input in secondary care or who were under primary care only were eligible. The 12-month PARTNERS intervention incorporated person centred coaching support and liaison work. The primary outcome was change in Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (MANSA). Results We allocated 39 general practices, with 198 participants, to the PARTNERS intervention (20 practices; 116 participants) or control (19 practices; 82 participants). Primary outcome data were available for 99 (85.3%) intervention and 71 (86.6%) control participants. Mean change in overall MANSA score did not differ between the groups (0.25 (s.d. 0.73) for intervention vs 0.21 (s.d. 0.86) for control); estimated fully adjusted between group difference 0.03, 95% CI -0.25 to 0.31; p=0.819. Acute mental health episodes (safety outcome) included three crises among those receiving the intervention and four among those not. Conclusion There was no evidence of a difference in quality of life, as measured with the MANSA, between those receiving the PARTNERS intervention and usual care. Shifting care to primary care was not associated with increased adverse outcomesen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR)en_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 20 April 2023en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1192/bjp.2023.28
dc.identifier.grantnumberRP-PG-0611-20004en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/132465
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-7373-8263 (Creanor, Emma)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherCambridge University Press / Royal College of Psychiatristsen_GB
dc.rights© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.en_GB
dc.titleThe effectiveness of a primary care based collaborative care model to improve quality of life in people with severe mental illness: the PARTNERS2 cluster randomised controlled trialen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2023-02-14T09:13:41Z
dc.identifier.issn1472-1465
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Cambridge University Press via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionData Availability and Governance Statement: Anonymised data may be made available by request to corresponding author. The study protocol has been published and a link to statistical analysis plan is included in the paper. CONSORT 2010 guidelines were followed in the reporting of this trial. Several authors had full access to all the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication. Changes from the original funding proposal include, following pilot work, a funded extension for a full trial (rather than an external pilot trial as originally funded), which is described in the published protocol, trial registry and statistical analysis plan. The discrepancies from the published protocol included provision of top up training for existing practitioners during the trial, changes made in response to COVID-19 included online delivery and remote data collection. The study protocol and statistical analysis plan have been publisheden_GB
dc.identifier.journalThe British Journal of Psychiatryen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-02-08
dcterms.dateSubmitted2022-03-16
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2023-02-08
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2023-02-13T17:53:40Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2023-05-05T12:59:32Z
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.