Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCobo, MM
dc.contributor.authorMoultrie, F
dc.contributor.authorHauck, AGV
dc.contributor.authorCrankshaw, D
dc.contributor.authorMonk, V
dc.contributor.authorHartley, C
dc.contributor.authorEvans Fry, R
dc.contributor.authorRobinson, S
dc.contributor.authorvan der Vaart, M
dc.contributor.authorBaxter, L
dc.contributor.authorAdams, E
dc.contributor.authorPoorun, R
dc.contributor.authorBhatt, A
dc.contributor.authorSlater, R
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-17T14:27:19Z
dc.date.issued2022-07-19
dc.date.updated2023-02-17T14:17:26Z
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: Newborn infants routinely undergo minor painful procedures as part of postnatal care, with infants born sick or premature requiring a greater number of procedures. As pain in early life can have long-term neurodevelopmental consequences and lead to parental anxiety and future avoidance of interventions, effective pain management is essential. Non-pharmacological comfort measures such as breastfeeding, swaddling and sweet solutions are inconsistently implemented and are not always practical or effective in reducing the transmission of noxious input to the brain. Stroking of the skin can activate C-tactile fibres and reduce pain, and therefore could provide a simple and safe parent-led intervention for the management of pain. The trial aim is to determine whether parental touch prior to a painful clinical procedure provides effective pain relief in neonates. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a multicentre randomised controlled trial. A total of 112 neonates born at 35 weeks' gestation or more requiring a blood test in the first week of life will be recruited and randomised to receive parental stroking either preprocedure or postprocedure. We will record brain activity (EEG), cardiac and respiratory dynamics, oxygen saturation and facial expression to provide proxy pain outcome measures. The primary outcome will be the reduction of noxious-evoked brain activity in response to a heel lance. Secondary outcomes will be a reduction in clinical pain scores (Premature Infant Pain Profile-Revised), postprocedural tachycardia and parental anxiety. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the London-South East Research Ethics Committee (ref: 21/LO/0523). The results will be widely disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, international conferences and via our partner neonatal charities Bliss and Supporting the Sick Newborn And their Parents (SSNAP). If the parental tactile intervention is effective, recommendations will be submitted via the National Health Service clinical guideline adoption process. STUDY STATUS: Commenced September 2021. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04901611; 14 135 962.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipWellcome Trusten_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipBlissen_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 12, No. 7, article e061841en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061841
dc.identifier.grantnumber207457/Z/17/Zen_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/132497
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0001-5504-5992 (Poorun, Ravi)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherBMJ Publishingen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36250332en_GB
dc.rights© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.en_GB
dc.subjectneonatologyen_GB
dc.subjectneurophysiologyen_GB
dc.subjectpain managementen_GB
dc.titleMulticentre, randomised controlled trial to investigate the effects of parental touch on relieving acute procedural pain in neonates (Petal)en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2023-02-17T14:27:19Z
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
exeter.article-numberARTN e061841
exeter.place-of-publicationEngland
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from BMJ Publishing via the DOI in this record. en_GB
dc.descriptionData availability statement: Data sharing not applicable as no data sets generated and/or analysed for this study. Not applicable.en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn2044-6055
dc.identifier.journalBMJ Openen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-07-04
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-07-19
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2023-02-17T14:22:03Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2023-02-17T14:27:23Z
refterms.panelAen_GB
refterms.dateFirstOnline2022-07-19


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.