Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFordham, B
dc.contributor.authorSmith, TO
dc.contributor.authorLamb, S
dc.contributor.authorMorris, A
dc.contributor.authorWinter, SC
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-01T09:14:56Z
dc.date.issued2022-11-14
dc.date.updated2023-02-28T16:29:45Z
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: The Getting Recovery Right After Neck Dissection (GRRAND) intervention is a physiotherapy programme for patients with head and neck cancer who have undergone neck dissection. The aim of this qualitative study was to understand if the intervention was useful, acceptable and whether it was feasible to conduct a randomised controlled trial (RCT). DESIGN: This qualitative study was embedded within the GRRAND-Feasibility (GRRAND-F) Study. SETTING: Participants were recruited from four acute National Health Service hospitals in England between 2020 and 2021. PARTICIPANTS: We interviewed four usual care and four intervention patient-participants from a single study site (Oxford). Six were male, two were female. All were white British ethnicity. We interviewed two physiotherapists from Oxford who delivered the GRRAND-F intervention, and physiotherapists from Birmingham, Poole and Norwich who were trained to deliver the intervention but were not able to deliver it within the study time frame. RESULTS: The analysis identified five themes: (1) Acceptability, (2) Adherence, (3) Outcomes, (4) Feasibility and (5) Stand-alone themes (prehabilitation, video consultations, healthcare use).Patient-participants and physiotherapist-participants agreed that usual care was not meeting patients' rehabilitation needs. The GRRAND intervention provided biopsychosocial support. In comparison to the usual care group, patient-participants who received the intervention were more confident that they could perform rehabilitation exercises and were more motivated to engage in long-term adaptive behaviour change. Physiotherapists felt they needed more administrative support to participate in an RCT. CONCLUSION: Participants felt that usual care was insufficient. GRRAND provided much needed, biopsychosocial support to patients. Participants were supportive that it would be feasible to test GRRAND in an RCT. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN11979997.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute of Health Research (NIHR)en_GB
dc.format.extente064269-
dc.format.mediumElectronic
dc.identifier.citationVol. 12 (11), article e064269en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064269
dc.identifier.grantnumberPB-PG-1217-20031en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/132578
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0003-4349-7195 (Lamb, Sarah)
dc.identifierScopusID: 7101956142 (Lamb, Sarah)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36375975en_GB
dc.rights© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.en_GB
dc.subjecthead & neck tumoursen_GB
dc.subjectqualitative researchen_GB
dc.subjectrehabilitation medicineen_GB
dc.subjectHumansen_GB
dc.subjectMaleen_GB
dc.subjectFemaleen_GB
dc.subjectFeasibility Studiesen_GB
dc.subjectPhysical Therapistsen_GB
dc.subjectNeck Dissectionen_GB
dc.subjectQualitative Researchen_GB
dc.subjectExercise Therapyen_GB
dc.subjectCost-Benefit Analysisen_GB
dc.titlePatient and physiotherapist perceptions of the Getting Recovery Right After Neck Dissection (GRRAND) rehabilitation intervention: a qualitative interview study embedded within a feasibility trialen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2023-03-01T09:14:56Z
exeter.article-numberARTN e064269
exeter.place-of-publicationEngland
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available from BMJ Publishing Group via the DOI in this record. en_GB
dc.descriptionAll data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn2044-6055
dc.identifier.journalBMJ Openen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofBMJ Open, 12(11)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-10-04
dc.rights.licenseCC BY
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-10-04
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2023-03-01T09:06:59Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2023-03-01T09:15:03Z
refterms.panelAen_GB
refterms.depositExceptionpublishedGoldOA
refterms.dateFirstOnline2022-11-14


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.