Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDando, TR
dc.contributor.authorCrowley, SL
dc.contributor.authorYoung, RP
dc.contributor.authorCarter, SP
dc.contributor.authorMcDonald, RA
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-23T09:52:36Z
dc.date.issued2022-12-23
dc.date.updated2023-03-23T08:55:48Z
dc.description.abstractImproving the effectiveness of conservation translocations could contribute to reversing global biodiversity loss. Although evaluations of ecological factors affecting translocation outcomes are commonplace, consideration of human social factors remains rare, hindering improvements to this conservation practice. We analysed 550 translocation case studies to explore the inclusion of social factors in project feasibility assessments. Reviewed projects often failed to assess social feasibility, and assessments, where attempted, tended to be narrow in scope. Consequently, challenges such as proactively addressing conflict often remained unaddressed. Insufficient knowledge sharing and prioritisation of ecological feasibility, to the detriment of social feasibility, remain barriers to effective planning. Successful outcomes of translocations are linked to early assessment of social feasibility and to the establishment of long-term commitments between people, places, and partners.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipVincent Wildlife Trusten_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipDurrell Wildlife Conservation Trusten_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity of Exeteren_GB
dc.format.extentS0169-5347(22)00293-2-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 23 December 2022en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2022.11.013
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/132747
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-4854-0925 (Crowley, Sarah L)
dc.identifierScopusID: 56658383600 (Crowley, Sarah L)
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-6922-3195 (McDonald, Robbie A)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherCell Pressen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36567154en_GB
dc.rights© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_GB
dc.subjectIUCNen_GB
dc.subjectconservationen_GB
dc.subjectecological restorationen_GB
dc.subjectreintroductionsen_GB
dc.subjectsocial feasibilityen_GB
dc.subjectsocial-ecologicalen_GB
dc.titleSocial feasibility assessments in conservation translocationsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2023-03-23T09:52:36Z
dc.identifier.issn0169-5347
exeter.place-of-publicationEngland
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Cell Press via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1872-8383
dc.identifier.journalTrends in Ecology and Evolutionen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofTrends Ecol Evol
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-11-29
dc.rights.licenseCC BY
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-12-23
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2023-03-23T09:49:53Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2023-03-23T09:52:41Z
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).