Social feasibility assessments in conservation translocations
dc.contributor.author | Dando, TR | |
dc.contributor.author | Crowley, SL | |
dc.contributor.author | Young, RP | |
dc.contributor.author | Carter, SP | |
dc.contributor.author | McDonald, RA | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-23T09:52:36Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-12-23 | |
dc.date.updated | 2023-03-23T08:55:48Z | |
dc.description.abstract | Improving the effectiveness of conservation translocations could contribute to reversing global biodiversity loss. Although evaluations of ecological factors affecting translocation outcomes are commonplace, consideration of human social factors remains rare, hindering improvements to this conservation practice. We analysed 550 translocation case studies to explore the inclusion of social factors in project feasibility assessments. Reviewed projects often failed to assess social feasibility, and assessments, where attempted, tended to be narrow in scope. Consequently, challenges such as proactively addressing conflict often remained unaddressed. Insufficient knowledge sharing and prioritisation of ecological feasibility, to the detriment of social feasibility, remain barriers to effective planning. Successful outcomes of translocations are linked to early assessment of social feasibility and to the establishment of long-term commitments between people, places, and partners. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Vincent Wildlife Trust | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | University of Exeter | en_GB |
dc.format.extent | S0169-5347(22)00293-2- | |
dc.format.medium | Print-Electronic | |
dc.identifier.citation | Published online 23 December 2022 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2022.11.013 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/132747 | |
dc.identifier | ORCID: 0000-0002-4854-0925 (Crowley, Sarah L) | |
dc.identifier | ScopusID: 56658383600 (Crowley, Sarah L) | |
dc.identifier | ORCID: 0000-0002-6922-3195 (McDonald, Robbie A) | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Cell Press | en_GB |
dc.relation.url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36567154 | en_GB |
dc.rights | © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). | en_GB |
dc.subject | IUCN | en_GB |
dc.subject | conservation | en_GB |
dc.subject | ecological restoration | en_GB |
dc.subject | reintroductions | en_GB |
dc.subject | social feasibility | en_GB |
dc.subject | social-ecological | en_GB |
dc.title | Social feasibility assessments in conservation translocations | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2023-03-23T09:52:36Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0169-5347 | |
exeter.place-of-publication | England | |
dc.description | This is the final version. Available on open access from Cell Press via the DOI in this record | en_GB |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1872-8383 | |
dc.identifier.journal | Trends in Ecology and Evolution | en_GB |
dc.relation.ispartof | Trends Ecol Evol | |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2022-11-29 | |
dc.rights.license | CC BY | |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2022-12-23 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2023-03-23T09:49:53Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | VoR | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2023-03-23T09:52:41Z | |
refterms.panel | A | en_GB |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).