Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCecchetti, M
dc.contributor.authorCrowley, SL
dc.contributor.authorGoodwin, CED
dc.contributor.authorCole, H
dc.contributor.authorMcDonald, J
dc.contributor.authorBearhop, S
dc.contributor.authorMcDonald, RA
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-23T10:38:48Z
dc.date.issued2021-09-26
dc.date.updated2023-03-23T09:05:36Z
dc.description.abstractPredation of wildlife by domestic cats Felis catus presents a threat to biodiversity conservation in some ecological contexts. The proportions of wild prey captured and eaten by domestic cats and thus the contributions of wild prey to cat diets are hard to quantify. This limits the understanding of any impacts of cats may have on wild animal populations and confounds analyses of the effects of interventions aimed at reducing wildlife killing. We used stable isotope analyses to quantify the relative contributions of wild and provisioned foods to the diets of domestic cats kept as companion animals and which frequently captured wild prey. We tested the effects of treatments aimed at reducing killing upon stable isotope ratios of cat whiskers and, where treatments had significant effects, we estimated variation in the contributions of wild prey to cats’ diets before and during treatment. We evaluated bells, Birdsbesafe collar covers, provision of food in a “puzzle feeder,” provision of food in which meat was the principal source of protein, object play, and a control group. As expected, cat diets consisted primarily of provisioned foods, though the contribution of wild animals to the diets of these cats, all of which regularly caught wild animals, was low (cat food ˜96%, wild animals ˜3–4%). Compared to the pre-treatment period and control group, cats with a Birdsbesafe collar cover exhibited a significant reduction in nitrogen stable isotope ratios in their whiskers and consumed less wild prey, most likely attributable to effective inhibition of hunting, particularly for birds. Fitting cats with a Birdsbesafe collar cover, therefore, reduced both returns of wild birds and consumption of wild prey. While multiple interventions can significantly affect the numbers of wild animals that cats capture and return home, the remarkably small dietary contributions made by wild animal prey mean dietary change is harder to discern. Domestic cats rely almost exclusively on food provided by people, even when they frequently kill wild animals. This suggests that the hunting behavior of domestic cats may be driven by behavioral motivations, or by a need to address micronutrient requirements, but is unlikely to alter macronutrient intake.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipSongBird Survivalen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipBritish Ecological Societyen_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 12(9), article e03737en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3737
dc.identifier.grantnumberLRB16/1013en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/132752
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-4854-0925 (Crowley, Sarah L)
dc.identifierScopusID: 56658383600 (Crowley, Sarah L)
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-5864-0129 (Bearhop, Stuart)
dc.identifierScopusID: 56840336400 | 6701787865 (Bearhop, Stuart)
dc.identifierResearcherID: G-3105-2012 (Bearhop, Stuart)
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-6922-3195 (McDonald, Robbie A)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWiley / Ecological Society of Americaen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.69p8cz920en_GB
dc.rights© 2021 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_GB
dc.subjectcatsen_GB
dc.subjectcompanion animal ecologyen_GB
dc.subjectdieten_GB
dc.subjectdomestic catsen_GB
dc.subjectmixing modelen_GB
dc.subjectpet fooden_GB
dc.subjectpredationen_GB
dc.subjectstable isotopeen_GB
dc.subjectwildlifeen_GB
dc.titleContributions of wild and provisioned foods to the diets of domestic cats that depredate wild animalsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2023-03-23T10:38:48Z
dc.identifier.issn2150-8925
exeter.article-numberARTN e03737
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Wiley via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionData Availability Statement: The data used in this study are available from Dryad: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.69p8cz920en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn2150-8925
dc.identifier.journalEcosphereen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofEcosphere, 12(9)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-04-08
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-09-26
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2023-03-23T10:36:27Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2023-03-23T10:38:54Z
refterms.panelAen_GB
refterms.dateFirstOnline2021-09-26


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2021 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2021 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.