Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMata‐Guel, EO
dc.contributor.authorSoh, MCK
dc.contributor.authorButler, CW
dc.contributor.authorMorris, RJ
dc.contributor.authorRazgour, O
dc.contributor.authorPeh, KS
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-31T08:21:35Z
dc.date.issued2023-03-29
dc.date.updated2023-03-30T14:49:16Z
dc.description.abstractIn spite of their small global area and restricted distributions, tropical montane forests (TMFs) are biodiversity hotspots and important ecosystem services providers, but are also highly vulnerable to climate change. To protect and preserve these ecosystems better, it is crucial to inform the design and implementation of conservation policies with the best available scientific evidence, and to identify knowledge gaps and future research needs. We conducted a systematic review and an appraisal of evidence quality to assess the impacts of climate change on TMFs. We identified several skews and shortcomings. Experimental study designs with controls and long-term (≥10 years) data sets provide the most reliable evidence, but were rare and gave an incomplete understanding of climate change impacts on TMFs. Most studies were based on predictive modelling approaches, short-term (<10 years) and cross-sectional study designs. Although these methods provide moderate to circumstantial evidence, they can advance our understanding on climate change effects. Current evidence suggests that increasing temperatures and rising cloud levels have caused distributional shifts (mainly upslope) of montane biota, leading to alterations in biodiversity and ecological functions. Neotropical TMFs were the best studied, thus the knowledge derived there can serve as a proxy for climate change responses in under-studied regions elsewhere. Most studies focused on vascular plants, birds, amphibians and insects, with other taxonomic groups poorly represented. Most ecological studies were conducted at species or community levels, with a marked paucity of genetic studies, limiting understanding of the adaptive capacity of TMF biota. We thus highlight the long-term need to widen the methodological, thematic and geographical scope of studies on TMFs under climate change to address these uncertainties. In the short term, however, in-depth research in well-studied regions and advances in computer modelling approaches offer the most reliable sources of information for expeditious conservation action for these threatened forests.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNatural Environment Research Council (NERC)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipMexican National Council of Science and Technology (CONACyT)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity of Southamptonen_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 29 March 2023en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12950
dc.identifier.grantnumberNE/M018660/2en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/132809
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0003-3186-0313 (Razgour, Orly)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWileyen_GB
dc.rights© 2023 The Authors. Biological Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Cambridge Philosophical Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly citeden_GB
dc.subjectbiodiversityen_GB
dc.subjectcloud forestsen_GB
dc.subjectconservationen_GB
dc.subjectecological levelsen_GB
dc.subjectecosystem functionsen_GB
dc.subjectevidence qualityen_GB
dc.subjectglobal warmingen_GB
dc.subjectresearch rigouren_GB
dc.subjectsystematic reviewen_GB
dc.subjecttropical mountainsen_GB
dc.titleImpacts of anthropogenic climate change on tropical montane forests: an appraisal of the evidenceen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2023-03-31T08:21:35Z
dc.identifier.issn1464-7931
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available from Wiley via the DOI in this record. en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1469-185X
dc.identifier.journalBiological Reviewsen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofBiological Reviews
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-03-10
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2023-03-29
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2023-03-31T08:17:56Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2023-03-31T08:22:56Z
refterms.panelAen_GB
refterms.dateFirstOnline2023-03-29


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2023 The Authors. Biological Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Cambridge Philosophical Society.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium,
provided the original work is properly cited
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2023 The Authors. Biological Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Cambridge Philosophical Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited