Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrusco, N
dc.contributor.authorGraven, C
dc.contributor.authorBoyd, L
dc.contributor.authorKugler, H
dc.contributor.authorDawes, H
dc.contributor.authorRawson, H
dc.contributor.authorClayton, L
dc.contributor.authorTan, S
dc.contributor.authorGoodwin, VA
dc.contributor.authorHall, AJ
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, NF
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-11T08:42:35Z
dc.date.issued2023-04-12
dc.date.updated2023-04-11T07:04:33Z
dc.description.abstractBackground: The Risk Assessment for moving Individuals SafEly (RAISE) program is a hospital-based manual handling nursing training program. RAISE involves upskilling on continual risk assessment during patient-assisted movements. RAISE aims to optimise staff and patient safety while providing the patient with movement and rehabilitation opportunities. Implementation of RAISE in the hospital setting has been established. The aim of this study was to explore the feasibility of implementing RAISE in the long-term care setting. Methods: We examined three feasibility domains: acceptability, practicality, and limited efficacy (observed nursing behaviour change which has the potential to reduce nursing injuries), using a prospective pilot pre-post design in the long-term care setting. Staff completed a 4-hour training session on RAISE delivered by two physiotherapists, followed by 8 hours of supported behaviour change in the workplace. Staff acceptability and practicality of incorporating risk assessment strategies into manual handling approaches were explored through pre- and post-training staff surveys and a semi-structured interview. Resident acceptability of manual handling practices was explored via survey data collected after the RAISE training. Pre to post-training changes in staff knowledge and behaviour were examined through the pre- and post-training staff survey, and observation of staff assisting resident movement. Results: Two enrolled nurses and five residents participated. Staff reported the RAISE program was acceptable and practical to implement in the long-term care setting. There were no adverse events or safety concerns. Staff reported the RAISE program provided guidance and enhanced staff empowerment to make decisions during assisted resident movement. There were 26 observed resident-staff manual handling interactions recorded, with 13 pre-training and 13 post-training. Post-training, RAISE skills had improved and were completed 100% of the time, except for completing a physical risk assessment which improved from 46% to 85%, demonstrating limited efficacy. Residents reported it’s important for staff to be trained on how to assist them to mobilise and they found the concept of the RAISE program acceptable. Conclusions: This pilot study supports the feasibility of long-term care facilities participating in future studies testing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Risk Assessment for moving Individuals SafEly (RAISE) patient and resident manual handling program.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipMonash Universityen_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 81, article 53en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13690-023-01074-7
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/132885
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0003-3860-9607 (Goodwin, Victoria)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherBMCen_GB
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2023. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the dataen_GB
dc.subjectManual handlingen_GB
dc.subjectRisk assessmenten_GB
dc.subjectFeasibilityen_GB
dc.subjectQualitative researchen_GB
dc.subjectNursesen_GB
dc.subjectLong-term careen_GB
dc.subjectOccupational healthen_GB
dc.titleFeasibility of implementing an innovative manual handling risk assessment training program for staff working in long-term careen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2023-04-11T08:42:35Z
dc.identifier.issn2049-3258
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from BMC via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalArchives of Public Healthen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-03-24
dcterms.dateSubmitted2022-10-01
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2023-03-24
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2023-04-11T07:04:35Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2023-05-09T13:50:47Z
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© The Author(s) 2023. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use,
sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and
the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this
article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included
in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will
need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The
Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available
in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © The Author(s) 2023. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data