Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGaston, KJ
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, K
dc.contributor.authorShutler, JD
dc.contributor.authorBrewin, RJW
dc.contributor.authorYan, X
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-18T14:54:42Z
dc.date.issued2023-04-05
dc.date.updated2023-04-18T08:17:06Z
dc.description.abstractFor much of their existence, the environmental benefits of artificial satellites, particularly through provision of remotely sensed data, seem likely to have greatly exceeded their environmental costs. With dramatic current and projected growth in the number of Earth-observation and other satellites in low Earth orbit, this trade-off now needs to be considered more carefully. Here we highlight the range of environmental impacts of satellite technology, taking a life-cycle approach to evaluate impacts from manufacture, through launch, to burn-up during de-orbiting. These include the use of renewable and nonrenewable resources (including those associated with the transmission, long-term storage, and distribution of data), atmospheric consequences of rocket launches and satellite de-orbiting, and impacts of a changing nighttime sky on humans and other organisms. Initial estimations of the scale of some impacts are sufficient to underscore the need for more detailed investigations and to identify potential means by which impacts can be reduced and mitigated.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipUKRIen_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 5 April 2023en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2624
dc.identifier.grantnumberMR/V022792/1en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/132935
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-3289-2598 | 0000-0003-3695-209X (Anderson, Karen)
dc.identifierScopusID: 55455157700 (Anderson, Karen)
dc.identifierResearcherID: ABC-3524-2021 (Anderson, Karen)
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-8018-123X (Shutler, Jamie D)
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0001-5134-8291 (Brewin, Robert JW)
dc.identifierScopusID: 35725269400 (Brewin, Robert JW)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWiley / Ecological Society of Americaen_GB
dc.rights© 2023 The Authors. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Ecological Society of America. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_GB
dc.titleEnvironmental impacts of increasing numbers of artificial space objectsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2023-04-18T14:54:42Z
dc.identifier.issn1540-9295
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available from Wiley via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionData Availability Statement: No data were collected for this study.en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1540-9309
dc.identifier.journalFrontiers in Ecology and the Environmenten_GB
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Ecology and the Environment
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2023-04-05
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2023-04-18T14:49:04Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2023-04-18T14:54:43Z
refterms.panelBen_GB
refterms.dateFirstOnline2023-04-05


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2023 The Authors. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Ecological Society of America.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2023 The Authors. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Ecological Society of America. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.