Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDixit, T
dc.contributor.authorChoi, GPT
dc.contributor.authorAl-Mosleh, S
dc.contributor.authorLund, J
dc.contributor.authorTroscianko, J
dc.contributor.authorMoya, C
dc.contributor.authorMahadevan, L
dc.contributor.authorSpottiswoode, CN
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-16T14:58:55Z
dc.date.issued2023-02-15
dc.date.updated2023-06-16T14:04:17Z
dc.description.abstractThe persistence of imperfect mimicry in nature presents a challenge to mimicry theory. Some hypotheses for the existence of imperfect mimicry make differing predictions depending on how mimetic fidelity is measured. Here, we measure mimetic fidelity in a brood parasite-host system using both trait-based and response-based measures of mimetic fidelity. Cuckoo finches Anomalospiza imberbis lay imperfectly mimetic eggs that lack the fine scribbling characteristic of eggs of the tawny-flanked prinia Prinia subflava, a common host species. A trait-based discriminant analysis based on Minkowski functionals-that use geometric and topological morphometric methods related to egg pattern shape and coverage-reflects this consistent difference between host and parasite eggs. These methods could be applied to quantify other phenotypes including stripes and waved patterns. Furthermore, by painting scribbles onto cuckoo finch eggs and testing their rate of rejection compared to control eggs (i.e. a response-based approach to quantify mimetic fidelity), we show that prinias do not discriminate between eggs based on the absence of scribbles. Overall, our results support relaxed selection on cuckoo finches to mimic scribbles, since prinias do not respond differently to eggs with and without scribbles, despite the existence of this consistent trait difference.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Science Foundationen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Councilen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipDST-NRF Centre of Excellence at the FitzPatrick Institute, University of Cape Townen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipRosemary Grant Advanced Award (Society for the Study of Evolution)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipBalfour studentship (University of Cambridge)en_GB
dc.format.extent20220538-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.identifier.citationVol. 19, No. 2, article 20220538en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2022.0538
dc.identifier.grantnumberDMS-2002103en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberBB/J014109/1en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/133411
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0001-9071-2594 (Troscianko, Jolyon)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherThe Royal Societyen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36789542en_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.63xsj3v60en_GB
dc.rights© 2023 The Authors. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.en_GB
dc.subjectMinkowski functionalsen_GB
dc.subjectavian brood parasitismen_GB
dc.subjectcoevolutionen_GB
dc.subjectimperfect mimicryen_GB
dc.subjectmimetic fidelityen_GB
dc.subjectreceiver perceptionen_GB
dc.titleCombined measures of mimetic fidelity explain imperfect mimicry in a brood parasite-host system.en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2023-06-16T14:58:55Z
dc.identifier.issn1744-9561
exeter.article-numberARTN 20220538
exeter.place-of-publicationEngland
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available from the Royal Society via the DOI in this record. en_GB
dc.descriptionData accessibility: Data, R code, and a description of the dataset associated with this manuscript are available from the Dryad Digital Repository: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.63xsj3v60. Supplementary methods and results are provided in the electronic supplementary material.en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1744-957X
dc.identifier.journalBiology Lettersen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofBiol Lett, 19(2)
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-01-24
dc.rights.licenseCC BY
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2023-02-15
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2023-06-16T14:55:52Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2023-06-16T14:58:59Z
refterms.panelAen_GB
refterms.dateFirstOnline2023-02-15


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2023 The Authors. 

Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2023 The Authors. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.