Combined measures of mimetic fidelity explain imperfect mimicry in a brood parasite-host system.
dc.contributor.author | Dixit, T | |
dc.contributor.author | Choi, GPT | |
dc.contributor.author | Al-Mosleh, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Lund, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Troscianko, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Moya, C | |
dc.contributor.author | Mahadevan, L | |
dc.contributor.author | Spottiswoode, CN | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-06-16T14:58:55Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-02-15 | |
dc.date.updated | 2023-06-16T14:04:17Z | |
dc.description.abstract | The persistence of imperfect mimicry in nature presents a challenge to mimicry theory. Some hypotheses for the existence of imperfect mimicry make differing predictions depending on how mimetic fidelity is measured. Here, we measure mimetic fidelity in a brood parasite-host system using both trait-based and response-based measures of mimetic fidelity. Cuckoo finches Anomalospiza imberbis lay imperfectly mimetic eggs that lack the fine scribbling characteristic of eggs of the tawny-flanked prinia Prinia subflava, a common host species. A trait-based discriminant analysis based on Minkowski functionals-that use geometric and topological morphometric methods related to egg pattern shape and coverage-reflects this consistent difference between host and parasite eggs. These methods could be applied to quantify other phenotypes including stripes and waved patterns. Furthermore, by painting scribbles onto cuckoo finch eggs and testing their rate of rejection compared to control eggs (i.e. a response-based approach to quantify mimetic fidelity), we show that prinias do not discriminate between eggs based on the absence of scribbles. Overall, our results support relaxed selection on cuckoo finches to mimic scribbles, since prinias do not respond differently to eggs with and without scribbles, despite the existence of this consistent trait difference. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | National Science Foundation | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | DST-NRF Centre of Excellence at the FitzPatrick Institute, University of Cape Town | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Rosemary Grant Advanced Award (Society for the Study of Evolution) | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Balfour studentship (University of Cambridge) | en_GB |
dc.format.extent | 20220538- | |
dc.format.medium | Print-Electronic | |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 19, No. 2, article 20220538 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2022.0538 | |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | DMS-2002103 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | BB/J014109/1 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/133411 | |
dc.identifier | ORCID: 0000-0001-9071-2594 (Troscianko, Jolyon) | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | The Royal Society | en_GB |
dc.relation.url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36789542 | en_GB |
dc.relation.url | https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.63xsj3v60 | en_GB |
dc.rights | © 2023 The Authors. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. | en_GB |
dc.subject | Minkowski functionals | en_GB |
dc.subject | avian brood parasitism | en_GB |
dc.subject | coevolution | en_GB |
dc.subject | imperfect mimicry | en_GB |
dc.subject | mimetic fidelity | en_GB |
dc.subject | receiver perception | en_GB |
dc.title | Combined measures of mimetic fidelity explain imperfect mimicry in a brood parasite-host system. | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2023-06-16T14:58:55Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1744-9561 | |
exeter.article-number | ARTN 20220538 | |
exeter.place-of-publication | England | |
dc.description | This is the final version. Available from the Royal Society via the DOI in this record. | en_GB |
dc.description | Data accessibility: Data, R code, and a description of the dataset associated with this manuscript are available from the Dryad Digital Repository: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.63xsj3v60. Supplementary methods and results are provided in the electronic supplementary material. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1744-957X | |
dc.identifier.journal | Biology Letters | en_GB |
dc.relation.ispartof | Biol Lett, 19(2) | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2023-01-24 | |
dc.rights.license | CC BY | |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2023-02-15 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2023-06-16T14:55:52Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | VoR | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2023-06-16T14:58:59Z | |
refterms.panel | A | en_GB |
refterms.dateFirstOnline | 2023-02-15 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2023 The Authors.
Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.