Older adults' perspectives of independence through time: Results of a longitudinal interview study
dc.contributor.author | Taylor, E | |
dc.contributor.author | Goodwin, VA | |
dc.contributor.author | Ball, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Clegg, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Brown, L | |
dc.contributor.author | Frost, J | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-06-20T08:50:24Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-06-18 | |
dc.date.updated | 2023-06-20T06:57:46Z | |
dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Understanding how older people experience independence has implications for person-centred care. Existing understanding of older people's experience of independence, generated through methods that provide a 'snapshot' view of a person's independence at a given time point, provide little insight about the process of maintaining independence through time. The aim of this study was to explore older participants' perceptions to understand the processes and resources that were most important for maintaining independence. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Two semi-structured interviews were conducted longitudinally to explore the perspectives of 12 community-dwelling, older people, aged 76-85 years. A social constructivist approach, using dramaturgical and descriptive codes, facilitated the interpretation of the data. Sixteen analytical questions guided exploration of participants' perceptions of independence through time. RESULTS: Older people suggested that objective representations underestimated, and omitted, important aspects of their independence through time. Some participants perceived 'snapshot' judgements of their independence as insensitive to their individual values and context. Change over time required some participants to adapt their methods for maintaining independence. The stability of participants' sense of independence was value-dependent and informed by the purpose a participant ascribed to maintaining independence. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: This study augments the understanding of independence as a complex and multifaceted construct. The findings challenge the congruence of common interpretations of independence with older people's views, showing areas of commonality and discrepancy. Exploration of independence in terms of form and function provides important understanding about how function takes precedence to form in determining the maintenance of independence through time. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 64 (2), article gnad073 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnad073 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/133427 | |
dc.identifier | ORCID: 0000-0003-3860-9607 (Goodwin, Victoria A) | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Oxford University Press / The Gerontological Society of America | en_GB |
dc.relation.url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37330641 | en_GB |
dc.rights | © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. | en_GB |
dc.subject | Autonomy and Self-Efficacy | en_GB |
dc.subject | Life course/Life span | en_GB |
dc.subject | Person-centred care | en_GB |
dc.subject | Resilience | en_GB |
dc.title | Older adults' perspectives of independence through time: Results of a longitudinal interview study | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2023-06-20T08:50:24Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0016-9013 | |
exeter.place-of-publication | United States | |
dc.description | This is the final version. Available on open access from Oxford University Press via the DOI in this record | en_GB |
dc.description | Data Availability: The qualitative data collected for this study is not publicly available in the form of full transcripts to protect the anonymity of participants. However, examples of how the data have been interpreted to inform the themes of this study are provided in the Online Supplementary Material along with the interview guide. The study was not pre-registered. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1758-5341 | |
dc.identifier.journal | Gerontologist | en_GB |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_GB |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2023-06-18 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2023-06-20T08:39:39Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | AM | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2023-06-20T08:50:28Z | |
refterms.panel | A | en_GB |
refterms.dateFirstOnline | 2023-06-18 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.