A climate science toolkit for high impact‐low likelihood climate risks
dc.contributor.author | Wood, RA | |
dc.contributor.author | Crucifix, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Lenton, TM | |
dc.contributor.author | Mach, KJ | |
dc.contributor.author | Moore, C | |
dc.contributor.author | New, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Sharpe, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Stocker, TF | |
dc.contributor.author | Sutton, RT | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-06-22T09:02:46Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-04-17 | |
dc.date.updated | 2023-06-21T12:51:32Z | |
dc.description.abstract | An important component of the risks from climate change arises from outcomes that are very unlikely, but whose impacts if they were to occur would be extremely severe. Examples include levels of surface warming, or changes in the water cycle, that are at the extreme of plausible ranges, or crossing of a climate system “tipping point” such as ice sheet or ocean circulation instability. If such changes were to occur their impacts on infrastructure or ecosystems may exceed existing plans for adaptation. The traditional approach of ensemble climate change projections is not well suited to managing these High Impact-Low Likelihood (HILL) risks, where the objective is to “prepare for the worst” rather than to “plan for what's likely.” In this paper we draw together a number of ideas from recent literature, to classify four types of HILL climate outcome and to propose the development of a practical “toolkit” of physical climate information that can be used in future to inform HILL risk management. The toolkit consists of several elements that would need to be developed for each plausible HILL climate outcome, then deployed individually to develop targeted HILL risk management approaches for individual sectors. We argue that development of the HILL toolkit should be an important focus for physical climate research over the coming decade, and that the time is right for a focused assessment of HILL risks by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in its 7th Assessment Cycle. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | US Department of Defense | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der wissenschaftlichen Forschung / Fonds national suisse de la recherche scientifique | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, UK Government | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Met Office Hadley Centre Climate Programme | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | AXA Research Fund | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Research Chair in African Climate Risk | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 11, No. 4, article e2022EF003369 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1029/2022ef003369 | |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | HR00112290031 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | 820970 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | 200492 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/133467 | |
dc.identifier | ORCID: 0000-0002-6725-7498 (Lenton, Timothy M) | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Wiley / American Geophysical Union | en_GB |
dc.rights | © 2023 Crown copyright and The Authors. This article is published with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the King's Printer for Scotland. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited | en_GB |
dc.subject | climate risk | en_GB |
dc.subject | tipping point | en_GB |
dc.subject | climate sensitivity | en_GB |
dc.subject | compound extremes | en_GB |
dc.subject | early warning | en_GB |
dc.subject | storyline | en_GB |
dc.title | A climate science toolkit for high impact‐low likelihood climate risks | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2023-06-22T09:02:46Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2328-4277 | |
exeter.article-number | ARTN e2022EF003369 | |
dc.description | This is the final version. Available from Wiley via the DOI in this record. | en_GB |
dc.description | Data Availability Statement: There was no actual data collected or used for writing this commentary. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | Earth's Future | en_GB |
dc.relation.ispartof | Earth's Future, 11(4) | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2023-03-10 | |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2023-04-17 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2023-06-22T08:57:04Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | VoR | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2023-06-22T09:03:26Z | |
refterms.panel | C | en_GB |
refterms.dateFirstOnline | 2023-04-17 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2023 Crown copyright and The Authors. This article is published with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the King's Printer for Scotland. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited