When perfection isn’t enough: host egg signatures are an effective defence against high-fidelity African cuckoo mimicry
dc.contributor.author | Lund, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Dixit, T | |
dc.contributor.author | Attwood, MC | |
dc.contributor.author | Hamama, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Moya, C | |
dc.contributor.author | Stevens, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Jamie, GA | |
dc.contributor.author | Spottiswoode, CN | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-06-29T14:07:19Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-07-26 | |
dc.date.updated | 2023-06-29T13:42:57Z | |
dc.description.abstract | Most mimicry systems involve imperfect mimicry, whereas perfect and high-fidelity mimicry are rare. When the fidelity of mimicry is high, mimics might be expected to have the upper hand against their antagonists. However, in coevolving systems, diversification of model phenotypes may provide an evolutionary escape, because mimics cannot simultaneously match all model individuals in the population. Here we investigate high-fidelity mimicry in a highly specialised, Afrotropical brood parasite-host system: the African cuckoo and fork-tailed drongo. Specifically, we test whether host egg polymorphisms are an effective defence against such mimicry. We show, using a combination of image analysis, field experiments, and simulations, that 1) egg colour and pattern mimicry of fork-tailed drongo eggs by African cuckoos is near-perfect on average; 2) drongos show fine-tuned rejection of foreign eggs, exploiting unpredictable pattern differences between parasitic eggs and their own; and 3) the high degree of interclutch variation (polymorphic egg ‘signatures’) exhibited by drongos gives them the upper hand in the arms race, with 93.7% of cuckoo eggs predicted to be rejected, despite cuckoos mimicking the full range of drongo egg phenotypes. These results demonstrate that model diversification is a highly effective defence against mimics, even when mimicry is highly accurate. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | University of Cape Town | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | University of Cambridge | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Royal Society | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 290 (2003), article 20231125 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1098/rspb.2023.1125 | |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | BB/J014109/1 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/133524 | |
dc.identifier | ORCID: 0000-0001-7768-3426 (Stevens, Martin) | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | The Royal Society | en_GB |
dc.relation.url | https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.8cz8w9gv1 | en_GB |
dc.relation.url | https://zenodo.org/record/7331450 | |
dc.rights | © 2023 The Authors. Open access. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. | en_GB |
dc.subject | perfect mimicry | en_GB |
dc.subject | avian brood parasitism | en_GB |
dc.subject | egg signatures | en_GB |
dc.subject | coevolution | en_GB |
dc.title | When perfection isn’t enough: host egg signatures are an effective defence against high-fidelity African cuckoo mimicry | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2023-06-29T14:07:19Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1471-2954 | |
dc.description | This is the final version. Available on open access from the Royal Society via the DOI in this record | en_GB |
dc.description | Data accessibility: Data and R code have been uploaded to Dryad: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.8cz8w9gv1 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences | en_GB |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2023-06-28 | |
dcterms.dateSubmitted | 2022-11-01 | |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2023-06-28 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2023-06-29T13:42:59Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | AM | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2023-08-03T10:05:36Z | |
refterms.panel | A | en_GB |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2023 The Authors. Open access. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.