Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLund, J
dc.contributor.authorDixit, T
dc.contributor.authorAttwood, MC
dc.contributor.authorHamama, S
dc.contributor.authorMoya, C
dc.contributor.authorStevens, M
dc.contributor.authorJamie, GA
dc.contributor.authorSpottiswoode, CN
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-29T14:07:19Z
dc.date.issued2023-07-26
dc.date.updated2023-06-29T13:42:57Z
dc.description.abstractMost mimicry systems involve imperfect mimicry, whereas perfect and high-fidelity mimicry are rare. When the fidelity of mimicry is high, mimics might be expected to have the upper hand against their antagonists. However, in coevolving systems, diversification of model phenotypes may provide an evolutionary escape, because mimics cannot simultaneously match all model individuals in the population. Here we investigate high-fidelity mimicry in a highly specialised, Afrotropical brood parasite-host system: the African cuckoo and fork-tailed drongo. Specifically, we test whether host egg polymorphisms are an effective defence against such mimicry. We show, using a combination of image analysis, field experiments, and simulations, that 1) egg colour and pattern mimicry of fork-tailed drongo eggs by African cuckoos is near-perfect on average; 2) drongos show fine-tuned rejection of foreign eggs, exploiting unpredictable pattern differences between parasitic eggs and their own; and 3) the high degree of interclutch variation (polymorphic egg ‘signatures’) exhibited by drongos gives them the upper hand in the arms race, with 93.7% of cuckoo eggs predicted to be rejected, despite cuckoos mimicking the full range of drongo egg phenotypes. These results demonstrate that model diversification is a highly effective defence against mimics, even when mimicry is highly accurate.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity of Cape Townen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity of Cambridgeen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipRoyal Societyen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC)en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 290 (2003), article 20231125en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1098/rspb.2023.1125
dc.identifier.grantnumberBB/J014109/1en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/133524
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0001-7768-3426 (Stevens, Martin)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherThe Royal Societyen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.8cz8w9gv1en_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://zenodo.org/record/7331450
dc.rights© 2023 The Authors. Open access. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.en_GB
dc.subjectperfect mimicryen_GB
dc.subjectavian brood parasitismen_GB
dc.subjectegg signaturesen_GB
dc.subjectcoevolutionen_GB
dc.titleWhen perfection isn’t enough: host egg signatures are an effective defence against high-fidelity African cuckoo mimicryen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2023-06-29T14:07:19Z
dc.identifier.issn1471-2954
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from the Royal Society via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionData accessibility: Data and R code have been uploaded to Dryad: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.8cz8w9gv1en_GB
dc.identifier.journalProceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciencesen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/  en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-06-28
dcterms.dateSubmitted2022-11-01
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2023-06-28
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2023-06-29T13:42:59Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2023-08-03T10:05:36Z
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2023 The Authors. Open access. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2023 The Authors. Open access. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.