Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOffiong, NM
dc.contributor.authorWu, Y
dc.contributor.authorMuniandy, D
dc.contributor.authorMemon, FA
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-22T13:32:36Z
dc.date.issued2021-08-17
dc.date.updated2023-08-22T12:38:36Z
dc.description.abstractPredicting early-stage failure in smart water taps (SWT) and selecting the most efficient tools to build failure prediction models are many challenges that water institutions face. In this study, three Deep Learning (DL) algorithms, i.e., the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and Bi-directional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM), were selected to analyse and determine the most appropriate among them for failure prediction in SWTs. This study uses a historical dataset acquired from smart water withdrawal taps to determine the most efficient DL neural network architecture for failure prediction in the SWT, leading to a hybrid model's development. After a comprehensive evaluation of the three ML models, findings show that a hybrid combination of the CNN and Bi-LSTM (CNNBiLSTM) models is a better solution for investigating failures in the SWT.en_GB
dc.format.extent424-436
dc.identifier.citationVol. 22(1), pp. 424-436en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2021.261
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/133841
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0003-0801-8443 (Wu, Y)
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-0779-083X (Memon, FA)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherIWA Publishingen_GB
dc.rights© 2022 The Authors. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_GB
dc.subjectBi-LSTMen_GB
dc.subjectCNNen_GB
dc.subjectdeep learningen_GB
dc.subjectfailure predictionen_GB
dc.subjectLSTMen_GB
dc.subjectsmart water tapsen_GB
dc.subjecttime-seriesen_GB
dc.titleA comprehensive comparative analysis of deep learning tools for modeling failures in smart water tapsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2023-08-22T13:32:36Z
dc.identifier.issn1606-9749
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from IWA Publishing via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionData availability statement: Data cannot be made publicly available; readers should contact the corresponding author for details.en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1607-0798
dc.identifier.journalWater Supplyen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofWater Science & Technology Water Supply, 22(1)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-08-05
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-08-17
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2023-08-22T13:30:54Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2023-08-22T13:32:40Z
refterms.panelBen_GB
refterms.dateFirstOnline2021-08-17


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2022 The Authors. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2022 The Authors. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).