Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSiddiqui, SA
dc.contributor.authorMahmood Salman, SH
dc.contributor.authorRedha, AA
dc.contributor.authorZannou, O
dc.contributor.authorChabi, IB
dc.contributor.authorOussou, KF
dc.contributor.authorBhowmik, S
dc.contributor.authorNirmal, NP
dc.contributor.authorMaqsood, S
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-04T08:42:39Z
dc.date.issued2023-09-01
dc.date.updated2023-09-03T06:53:53Z
dc.description.abstractFunctional foods derived from milk are essential for human health, including fermented milk, dairy beverages, cheeses, and dairy sweets. The nutritional composition of different milk sources varies, impacting the qualities of resultant functional foods. Goat milk has health-promoting compounds, including calcium, medium-chain fatty acids, and α-casein. Sheep milk has significant amounts of vitamins A, C, thiamine, and folic acid. Buffalo milk is regarded as a nearly complete food item in the human diet and provides greater levels of α-and κ-casein relative to bovine milk. Mare and donkey milk is rich in carbohydrates and proteins, with low-fat contents, making it a suitable dietary option. Camel milk is rich in calcium, potassium, vitamin A, and the absence of β-lactoglobulin, a major allergy compared with bovine milk. This review highlights the nutritional properties of non-bovine milk sources, which could be potentially used in the dairy industry similar to that of bovine milk.en_GB
dc.format.extent105790-105790
dc.identifier.citationArticle 105790en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2023.105790
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/133920
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevieren_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder embargo until 1 September 2024 in compliance with publisher policyen_GB
dc.rights© 2023 Published by Elsevier Ltd. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  en_GB
dc.titlePhysicochemical and nutritional properties of different non-bovine milk and dairy products: A reviewen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2023-09-04T08:42:39Z
dc.identifier.issn0958-6946
exeter.article-number105790
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Elsevier via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalInternational Dairy Journalen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Dairy Journal
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-08-27
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2023-09-01
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2023-09-04T08:40:30Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2024-08-31T23:00:00Z
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2023 Published by Elsevier Ltd. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2023 Published by Elsevier Ltd. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/