Lower limb muscle strength and balance in older adults with a distal radius fracture: a systematic review.
dc.contributor.author | Forde, C | |
dc.contributor.author | Nicolson, PJ | |
dc.contributor.author | Vye, C | |
dc.contributor.author | Pun, JC | |
dc.contributor.author | Sheehan, W | |
dc.contributor.author | Costa, ML | |
dc.contributor.author | Lamb, SE | |
dc.contributor.author | Keene, DJ | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-10-04T13:29:55Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-09-18 | |
dc.date.updated | 2023-10-04T12:41:32Z | |
dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND: Distal radius fractures are common fractures in older adults and associated with increased risk of future functional decline and hip fracture. Whether lower limb muscle strength and balance are impaired in this patient population is uncertain. To help inform rehabilitation requirements, this systematic review aimed to compare lower limb muscle strength and balance between older adults with a distal radius fracture with matched controls, and to synthesise lower limb muscle strength and balance outcomes in older adults with a distal radius fracture. METHODS: We searched Embase, MEDLINE, and CINAHL (1990 to 25 May 2022) for randomised and non-randomised controlled clinical trials and observational studies that measured lower limb muscle strength and/or balance using instrumented measurements or validated tests, in adults aged ≥ 50 years enrolled within one year after distal radius fracture. We appraised included observational studies using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and included randomised controlled trials using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Due to the clinical and methodological heterogeneity in included studies, we synthesised results narratively in tables and text. RESULTS: Nineteen studies (10 case-control studies, five case series, and four randomised controlled trials) of variable methodological quality and including 1835 participants (96% women, mean age 55-73 years, median sample size 82) were included. Twelve included studies (63%) assessed strength using 10 different methods with knee extension strength most commonly assessed (6/12 (50%) studies). Five included case-control studies (50%) assessed lower limb strength. Cases demonstrated impaired strength during functional tests (two studies), but knee extension strength assessment findings were conflicting (three studies). Eighteen included studies (95%) assessed balance using 14 different methods. Single leg balance was most commonly assessed (6/18 (33%) studies). All case-control studies assessed balance with inconsistent findings. CONCLUSION: Compared to controls, there is some evidence that older adults with a distal radius fracture have impaired lower limb muscle strength and balance. A cautious interpretation is required due to inconsistent findings across studies and/or outcome measures. Heterogeneity in control participants' characteristics, study design, study quality, and assessment methods limited synthesis of results. Robust case-control and/or prospective observational studies are needed. REGISTRATION: International prospective register of systematic reviews (date of registration: 02 July 2020, registration identifier: CRD42020196274). | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | NIHR Biomedical Research Centre | en_GB |
dc.format.extent | 741- | |
dc.format.medium | Electronic | |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 24, No. 1, article 741 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06711-4 | |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | PDF-2016-09-056 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/134163 | |
dc.identifier | ORCID: 0000-0003-4349-7195 (Lamb, Sarah E) | |
dc.identifier | ScopusID: 7101956142 (Lamb, Sarah E) | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | BMC | en_GB |
dc.relation.url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37723447 | en_GB |
dc.rights | © The Author(s) 2023. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. | en_GB |
dc.subject | Balance | en_GB |
dc.subject | Colles fracture | en_GB |
dc.subject | Falls | en_GB |
dc.subject | Fragility fracture | en_GB |
dc.subject | Muscle strength | en_GB |
dc.subject | Rehabilitation | en_GB |
dc.subject | Wrist fracture | en_GB |
dc.title | Lower limb muscle strength and balance in older adults with a distal radius fracture: a systematic review. | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2023-10-04T13:29:55Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1471-2474 | |
exeter.article-number | 741 | |
exeter.place-of-publication | England | |
dc.description | This is the final version. Available from BMC via the DOI in this record. | en_GB |
dc.description | Data Availability: The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders | en_GB |
dc.relation.ispartof | BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 24(1) | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2023-07-09 | |
dc.rights.license | CC BY | |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2023-09-18 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2023-10-04T13:26:38Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | VoR | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2023-10-04T13:29:55Z | |
refterms.panel | A | en_GB |
refterms.dateFirstOnline | 2023-09-18 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © The Author(s) 2023. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use,
sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and
the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this
article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included
in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will
need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The
Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available
in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.