Objectives:
Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) techniques are being studied as a possible diagnostic and predictive tool for the evaluation of cervical spinal cord disease. This systematic review aims to evaluate the previous DTI studies that specifically investigated the repeatability and reproducibility of DTI in the cervical spinal ...
Objectives:
Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) techniques are being studied as a possible diagnostic and predictive tool for the evaluation of cervical spinal cord disease. This systematic review aims to evaluate the previous DTI studies that specifically investigated the repeatability and reproducibility of DTI in the cervical spinal cord.
Methods and materials:
A search in the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Ovid electronic databases was conducted for articles published between January 1990 and February 2022 that related to the repeatability and reproducibility of DTI in evaluating the cervical spinal cord using one of the following measurements: the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and/or the coefficient of variation (CV), and/or Bland-Altman (BA) differences analysis methods. DTI studies that presented full statistical analysis of repeatability and/or reproducibility tests of the cervical spinal cord in peer-reviewed full-text publications published in journals were included. Articles that included at least one of the keywords within the titles or abstracts were identified. Additional full-text papers were found by searching the citations and reference lists of related articles. This review has followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidance. Risk of bias was evaluated with 13 criteria weighted toward methodological quality of reported studies using the QuADS assessment criteria. This assessment only included full-text articles written in English.
Results:
A total of 11 studies were included and assessed for different characteristics, including sample size,(3–34) re-test time interval (<1 h to >3 months), test-retest reproducibility scores and acquisition method. Six studies used ICC which ranged from poor (ICC<0.37) to excellent reproducibility (ICC 0.91–0.99). Four studies reported an overall CV lower than 40% for all DTI metrics. Three studies reported the Bland-Altman (BA) differences and reported a minimum percentage showing no strong differences between repeated measurements. Quantitative analysis was not undertaken due to heterogeneity of methods. Repeatability and reproducibility measures were generally found to be good.
Conclusion:
This study revealed that the application of DTI and its related measures in a clinical setting in the assessment of cervical spinal cord changes is feasible and reproducible. However, cervical spinal cord DTI suffers from some existing limitations that prevent it from being routinely used in research and clinical settings.
