On how data are partitioned in model development and evaluation: Confronting the elephant in the room to enhance model generalization
dc.contributor.author | Maier, HR | |
dc.contributor.author | Zheng, F | |
dc.contributor.author | Gupta, H | |
dc.contributor.author | Chen, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Mai, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Savic, D | |
dc.contributor.author | Loritz, R | |
dc.contributor.author | Wu, W | |
dc.contributor.author | Guo, D | |
dc.contributor.author | Bennett, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Jakeman, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Razavi, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Zhao, J | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-10-05T09:04:37Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-07-31 | |
dc.date.updated | 2023-10-05T06:45:46Z | |
dc.description.abstract | Models play a pivotal role in advancing our understanding of Earth's physical nature and environmental systems, aiding in their efficient planning and management. The accuracy and reliability of these models heavily rely on data, which are generally partitioned into subsets for model development and evaluation. Surprisingly, how this partitioning is done is often not justified, even though it determines what model we end up with, how we assess its performance and what decisions we make based on the resulting model outputs. In this study, we shed light on the paramount importance of meticulously considering data partitioning in the model development and evaluation process, and its significant impact on model generalization. We identify flaws in existing data-splitting approaches and propose a forward-looking strategy to effectively confront the “elephant in the room”, leading to improved model generalization capabilities. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | National Natural Science Foundation of China | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Australian Research Council (ARC) | en_GB |
dc.format.extent | 105779- | |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 167, article 105779 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105779 | |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | 52261160379 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | DE210100117 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/134168 | |
dc.identifier | ORCID: 0000-0001-9567-9041 (Savic, Dragan) | |
dc.identifier | ScopusID: 35580202000 (Savic, Dragan) | |
dc.identifier | ResearcherID: G-2071-2012 | L-8559-2019 (Savic, Dragan) | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_GB |
dc.rights | © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). | en_GB |
dc.subject | Model development | en_GB |
dc.subject | Model evaluation | en_GB |
dc.subject | Data partitioning | en_GB |
dc.subject | Data splitting | en_GB |
dc.subject | Calibration | en_GB |
dc.subject | Validation | en_GB |
dc.subject | Uncertainty | en_GB |
dc.subject | Earth systems | en_GB |
dc.title | On how data are partitioned in model development and evaluation: Confronting the elephant in the room to enhance model generalization | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2023-10-05T09:04:37Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1364-8152 | |
exeter.article-number | 105779 | |
dc.description | This is the final version. Available on open access from Elsevier via the DOI in this record | en_GB |
dc.description | Data availability: No data was used for the research described in the article. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1873-6726 | |
dc.identifier.journal | Environmental Modelling and Software | en_GB |
dc.relation.ispartof | Environmental Modelling & Software, 167 | |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2023-07-27 | |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2023-07-31 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2023-10-05T08:47:36Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | VoR | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2023-10-05T09:04:38Z | |
refterms.panel | B | en_GB |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).