Development of an opportunistic diagnostic prediction algorithm for osteoporosis and fragility fracture risk estimates from forearm radiographs (The OFFER1 Study)
Meertens, R; Lopez, B; Crone, B; et al.Gundry, M; Metcalfe-Smith, E; Gibbard, W; Manning, F; Scott, P; McWilliam, R
Date: 7 November 2023
Preprint
Publisher
University of Exeter
Abstract
Osteoporosis and associated fractures are an increasingly prevalent concern in context with an ageing population. This study reports testing of IBEX Bone Health (IBEX BH) software, applied following acquisition of forearm radiographs. IBEX BH analyses the radiograph to measure areal bone mineral density (aBMD) at the examination ...
Osteoporosis and associated fractures are an increasingly prevalent concern in context with an ageing population. This study reports testing of IBEX Bone Health (IBEX BH) software, applied following acquisition of forearm radiographs. IBEX BH analyses the radiograph to measure areal bone mineral density (aBMD) at the examination site.
A non-randomised cross-sectional study design was performed involving 261 (254 after exclusions) participants (112/142 m/f; mean age 70.8years (SD+/-9.0); 53 with osteoporosis). They underwent posterior-anterior distal forearm radiographs; dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the wrists, hips and lumbar spine; and, questionnaires exploring clinical risk factors.
IBEX BH automatically identifies regions of interest (ROI) at the ultra-distal (UD) and distal third (TD) regions of the radius. Analysis investigated the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) performance of IBEX BH for prediction of i) osteoporosis (based on clinical reporting of the hip and spine DXA) and ii) treatment recommendations by Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) inclusive of neck of femur (NoF) areal bone mineral density (aBMD) results following National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG) guidelines.
AUC for osteoporosis prediction at the UD and TD ROIs were 0.86 (99% Confidence interval (CI) [0.80, 0.91]) and 0.81 (99% CI [0.75, 0.88]), respectively. AUC for treatment recommendation using FRAX inclusive of NoF aBMD at the UD and TD ROIs were 0.95 (99% CI [0.91, 1.00]) and 0.97 (99% CI [0.93,1.00]), respectively. With a matched sensitivity to FRAX (without NoF aBMD) 0.93 (99% CI [0.78, 0.99]), IBEX BH predicted at the UD and TD ROIs recommended treatment outcomes by NOGG guidelines using FRAX (with NoF aBMD) with specificity 0.89 (99% CI 0.83, 0.94]) and 0.93 (99% CI [0.87, 0.97]), respectively. This is compared with 0.60 (99% CI [0.51, 0.69]) for FRAX (without NoF aBMD). Results demonstrate the potential clinical utility of IBEX BH as an opportunistic screening tool.
Health and Care Professions
Faculty of Health and Life Sciences
Item views 0
Full item downloads 0