Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTutton, E
dc.contributor.authorGould, J
dc.contributor.authorLamb, SE
dc.contributor.authorCosta, ML
dc.contributor.authorKeene, DJ
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-15T15:32:10Z
dc.date.issued2023-07-24
dc.date.updated2023-11-15T14:12:46Z
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: To explore patient and staff experience of best-practice rehabilitation advice (one session of face-to-face self-management advice with up to two additional optional sessions) compared with progressive functional exercise (up to six sessions of face-to-face physiotherapy) after ankle fracture. DESIGN: The study drew on phenomenology using interviews and a focus group. SETTING: Participants were from three NHS Trusts in England, UK. PARTICIPANTS: A purposive sample of 20 patients with ankle (malleolar) fractures from the Ankle Fracture Treatment: Enhancing Rehabilitation-pilot trial (now completed) were interviewed (median 50 min) from May 2019 to January 2020. They were 6 months post injury, over 50 years of age, (median 66, 12 females) and had received surgical or non-surgical treatment (seven internal fixation surgery, seven close contact casting, six walking boot). A focus group of five physiotherapists who had provided the study interventions (2.5 hours) was undertaken. RESULTS: The findings show the acceptability of both interventions through the themes, 'being helped' (for patients) and 'developing expertise' (for staff) with subthemes of choosing and progressing. Progressive exercise added value with a perceived increase in strength, motion, ability to undertake activities and continued use of the workbook. Both staff and patients valued physiotherapy expertise demonstrated through interpersonal skills, advice, individualised exercise plans and active monitoring of progression. Best practice advice was particularly helpful in the early stages of recovery and with the use of mobility aids. CONCLUSION: Both interventions were acceptable but progressive exercise was highly valued by patients. Developing expertise through experiential learning enabled staff to facilitate progression. Adjustments to the workbook and the addition of exercises for continued recovery in the best practice advice would enhance a future study. Research during treatment provision may provide further insights into the challenges of facilitating progression of exercise. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN16612336; AFTER-pilot trial).en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute for Health Researchen_GB
dc.format.extente071678-
dc.format.mediumElectronic
dc.identifier.citationVol. 13, No. 7, article e071678en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071678
dc.identifier.grantnumberPDF-2016-09-056en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/134548
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0003-4349-7195 (Lamb, Sarah E)
dc.identifierScopusID: 7101956142 (Lamb, Sarah E)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherBMJ Publishingen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37487681en_GB
dc.rights© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.en_GB
dc.subjectAnkle Fractureen_GB
dc.subjectClinical Trialen_GB
dc.subjectExercise Therapyen_GB
dc.subjectPilot Projectsen_GB
dc.subjectPhysical Therapistsen_GB
dc.subjectQualitative Researchen_GB
dc.titleExperience of patients and physiotherapists within the AFTER pilot randomised trial of two rehabilitation interventions for people aged 50 years and over post ankle fracture: a qualitative study.en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2023-11-15T15:32:10Z
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
exeter.article-numberARTN e071678
exeter.place-of-publicationEngland
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available from BMJ Publishing via the DOI in this record. en_GB
dc.descriptionData availability statement: Data are available upon reasonable request.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalBMJ Openen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofBMJ Open, 13(7)
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-06-12
dc.rights.licenseCC BY-NC
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2023-07-24
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2023-11-15T15:23:58Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2023-11-15T15:32:32Z
refterms.panelAen_GB
refterms.dateFirstOnline2023-07-24


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© Author(s) (or their
employer(s)) 2023. Re-use
permitted under CC BY-NC. No
commercial re-use. See rights
and permissions. Published by
BMJ.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.