Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMolloy, CD
dc.contributor.authorLong, L
dc.contributor.authorMordi, IR
dc.contributor.authorBridges, C
dc.contributor.authorSagar, VA
dc.contributor.authorDavies, EJ
dc.contributor.authorCoats, AJS
dc.contributor.authorDalal, H
dc.contributor.authorRees, K
dc.contributor.authorSingh, SJ
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, RS
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-28T09:29:24Z
dc.date.issued2023-10-18
dc.date.updated2023-11-28T09:14:00Z
dc.description.abstractAIMS: Despite strong evidence, access to exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (ExCR) remains low across global healthcare systems. We provide a contemporary update of the Cochrane review randomized trial evidence for ExCR for adults with heart failure (HF) and compare different delivery modes: centre-based, home-based (including digital support), and both (hybrid). METHODS AND RESULTS: Databases, bibliographies of previous systematic reviews and included trials, and trials registers were searched with no language restrictions. Randomized controlled trials, recruiting adults with HF, assigned to either ExCR or a no-exercise control group, with follow-up of ≥6 months were included. Two review authors independently screened titles for inclusion, extracted trial and patient characteristics, outcome data, and assessed risk of bias. Outcomes of mortality, hospitalization, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were pooled across trials using meta-analysis at short-term (≤12 months) and long-term follow-up (>12 months) and stratified by delivery mode. Sixty trials (8728 participants) were included. In the short term, compared to control, ExCR did not impact all-cause mortality (relative risk [RR] 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71-1.21), reduced all-cause hospitalization (RR 0.69; 95% CI 0.56-0.86, number needed to treat: 13, 95% CI 9-22), and was associated with a clinically important improvement in HRQoL measured by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLWHF) overall score (mean difference: -7.39; 95% CI -10.30 to -4.47). Improvements in outcomes with ExCR was seen across centre, home (including digitally supported), and hybrid settings. A similar pattern of results was seen in the long term (mortality: RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.72-1.04; all-cause hospitalization: RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.70-1.01, MLWHF: -9.59, 95% CI -17.48 to -1.50). CONCLUSIONS: To improve global suboptimal levels of uptake for HF patients, global healthcare systems need to routinely recommend ExCR and offer a choice of mode of delivery, dependent on an individual patient's level of risk and complexity.en_GB
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 18 October 2023en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.3046
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/134678
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-7316-7544 (Dalal, Hasnain)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWiley / European Society of Cardiologyen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37850321en_GB
dc.rights© 2023 The Authors. European Journal of Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are madeen_GB
dc.subjectCardiac rehabilitationen_GB
dc.subjectExercise trainingen_GB
dc.subjectHealth-related quality of lifeen_GB
dc.subjectHeart failureen_GB
dc.subjectHospitalizationen_GB
dc.subjectMortalityen_GB
dc.titleExercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for adults with heart failure - 2023 Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysisen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2023-11-28T09:29:24Z
dc.identifier.issn1388-9842
exeter.place-of-publicationEngland
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Wiley via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1879-0844
dc.identifier.journalEuropean Journal of Heart Failureen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofEur J Heart Fail
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-10-02
dc.rights.licenseCC BY-NC-ND
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2023-10-18
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2023-11-28T09:24:52Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2023-11-28T09:29:40Z
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2023 The Authors. European Journal of Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and
distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2023 The Authors. European Journal of Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made