Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAlexander, CM
dc.contributor.authorMartyr, A
dc.contributor.authorGamble, LD
dc.contributor.authorQuinn, C
dc.contributor.authorPentecost, C
dc.contributor.authorMorris, RG
dc.contributor.authorClare, L
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-12T15:23:08Z
dc.date.issued2023-12-11
dc.date.updated2023-12-12T14:49:53Z
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The discrepancy between caregiver-ratings and self-ratings of abilities is commonly used to assess awareness in people with dementia. We investigated the contribution of caregiver and dyadic characteristics to the difference in perspective between caregiver-informants and people with dementia about difficulties experienced, when considering awareness of condition. Methods: We conducted exploratory cross-sectional analyses using data from the IDEAL cohort. Participants were 1,038 community-dwelling people with mild-to-moderate dementia, and coresident spouse/partner caregivers. The Representations and Adjustment to Dementia Index (RADIX) checklist reporting difficulties commonly experienced in dementia was completed by 960 caregiver-informants and 989 people with dementia. Difference in scores was calculated for 916 dyads. Demographic information, cognition, informant-rated functional ability and neuropsychiatric symptoms were recorded for the person with dementia. Self-reported data were collected on mood, comorbidity, religion, importance of religion, relationship quality, and caregiver stress. Results: For most dyads, caregivers reported more RADIX difficulties than people with dementia. Caregiver RADIX ratings were more closely associated with informant-rated functional ability and neuropsychiatric symptoms than with cognition. More RADIX difficulties and higher stress were reported by female caregivers. Greater RADIX difference was associated with more caregiver stress, and older age but less depression in people with dementia. Conclusion: Few dyadic characteristics were important, but caregiver stress was higher where caregivers reported more RADIX difficulties and/or the difference in perspective was greater, whereas partners with dementia reported better mood. In addition to offering information about awareness of condition, the caregiver rating and difference in perspectives could indicate where more support is needed.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEconomic and Social Research Council (ESRC)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipAlzheimer’s Societyen_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 15, article 1277336en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2023.1277336
dc.identifier.grantnumberES/L001853/2en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumber348, AS-PR2-16-001en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/134777
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-1702-8902 (Martyr, Anthony)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherFrontiers Mediaen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://reshare.ukdataservice.ac.uk/854293/en_GB
dc.rights© 2023 Alexander, Martyr, Gamble, Quinn, Pentecost, Morris, Clare and on behalf of the IDEAL study team. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.en_GB
dc.subjectdiscrepancyen_GB
dc.subjectinformant ratingsen_GB
dc.subjecteveryday difficultiesen_GB
dc.subjectdyadicen_GB
dc.subjectcaregiver stressen_GB
dc.subjectcarer stressen_GB
dc.titleDyadic influences on awareness of condition in people with dementia: findings from the IDEAL cohorten_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2023-12-12T15:23:08Z
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Frontiers Media via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionData availability statement: Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. IDEAL data were deposited with the UK data archive in April 2020. Details of how to access the data can be found here: https://reshare.ukdataservice.ac.uk/854293/en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1663-4365
dc.identifier.journalFrontiers in Aging Neuroscienceen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-11-20
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2023-12-11
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2023-12-12T15:19:00Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2023-12-12T15:23:13Z
refterms.panelAen_GB
refterms.dateFirstOnline2023-12-11


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2023 Alexander, Martyr, Gamble, Quinn, Pentecost, Morris, Clare and on behalf of the IDEAL study team. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2023 Alexander, Martyr, Gamble, Quinn, Pentecost, Morris, Clare and on behalf of the IDEAL study team. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.