Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJolivet, D
dc.contributor.authorFransen, S
dc.contributor.authorAdger, WN
dc.contributor.authorFábos, A
dc.contributor.authorAbu, M
dc.contributor.authorAllen, C
dc.contributor.authorBoyd, E
dc.contributor.authorCarr, ER
dc.contributor.authorCodjoe, SNA
dc.contributor.authorGavonel, MF
dc.contributor.authorGemenne, F
dc.contributor.authorRocky, MH
dc.contributor.authorLantz, J
dc.contributor.authorMaculule, D
dc.contributor.authorde Campos, RS
dc.contributor.authorSiddiqui, T
dc.contributor.authorZickgraf, C
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-19T12:11:20Z
dc.date.issued2023-05-18
dc.date.updated2023-12-19T11:14:15Z
dc.description.abstractResearch on the impacts of COVID-19 on mobility has focused primarily on the increased health vulnerabilities of involuntary migrant and displaced populations. But virtually all migration flows have been truncated and altered because of reduced economic and mobility opportunities of migrants. Here we use a well-established framework of migration decision-making, whereby individual decisions combine the aspiration and ability to migrate, to explain how public responses to the COVID-19 pandemic alter migration patterns among urban populations across the world. The principal responses to COVID-19 pandemic that affected migration are: 1) through travel restrictions and border closures, 2) by affecting abilities to move through economic and other means, and 3) by affecting aspirations to move. Using in-depth qualitative data collected in six cities in four continents (Accra, Amsterdam, Brussels, Dhaka, Maputo, and Worcester), we explore how populations with diverse levels of education and occupations were affected in their current and future mobility decisions. We use data from interviews with sample of internal and international migrants and non-migrants during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic outbreak to identify the mechanisms through which the pandemic affected their mobility decisions. The results show common processes across the different geographical contexts: individuals perceived increased risks associated with further migration, which affected their migration aspirations, and had reduced abilities to migrate, all of which affected their migration decision-making processes. The results also reveal stark differences in perceived and experienced migration decision-making across precarious migrant groups compared to high-skilled and formally employed international migrants in all settings. This precarity of place is particularly evident in low-income marginalised populations.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEconomic and Social Research Council (ESRC)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipISSCen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Science Foundation (NSF)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNWOen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipVRen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Union Horizon 2020en_GB
dc.format.extent250-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.identifier.citationVol. 10, article 250en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01721-y
dc.identifier.grantnumberES/S007687/1en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/134827
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0003-4244-2854 (Adger, William Neil)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSpringer Natureen_GB
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2023. Open access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dc.titleCOVID-19 responses restricted abilities and aspirations for mobility and migration: insights from diverse cities in four continentsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2023-12-19T12:11:20Z
dc.identifier.issn2662-9992
exeter.article-number250
exeter.place-of-publicationEngland
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Springer Nature via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionData availability: The datasets of interview transcripts generated and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn2662-9992
dc.identifier.journalHumanities and Social Sciences Communicationsen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofHumanit Soc Sci Commun, 10(1)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-04-25
dc.rights.licenseCC BY
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2023-05-18
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2023-12-19T12:08:03Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2023-12-19T12:11:28Z
refterms.panelCen_GB
refterms.dateFirstOnline2023-05-18


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© The Author(s) 2023. Open access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © The Author(s) 2023. Open access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/