Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTan, M
dc.contributor.authorZhang, S
dc.contributor.authorStevens, M
dc.contributor.authorLi, D
dc.contributor.authorTan, EJ
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-19T14:26:09Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-04
dc.date.updated2023-12-19T11:57:22Z
dc.description.abstractMotion is a crucial part of the natural world, yet our understanding of how animals avoid predation whilst moving remains rather limited. Although several theories have been proposed for how antipredator defence may be facilitated during motion, there is often a lack of supporting empirical evidence, or conflicting findings. Furthermore, many studies have shown that motion often ‘breaks’ camouflage, as sudden movement can be detected even before an individual is recognised. Whilst some static camouflage strategies may conceal moving animals to a certain extent, more emphasis should be given to other modes of camouflage and related defences in the context of motion (e.g. flicker fusion camouflage, active motion camouflage, motion dazzle, and protean motion). Furthermore, when motion is involved, defence strategies are not necessarily limited to concealment. An animal can also rely on motion to mislead predators with regards to its trajectory, location, size, colour pattern, or even identity. In this review, we discuss the various underlying antipredator strategies and the mechanisms through which they may be linked to motion, conceptualising existing empirical and theoretical studies from two perspectives – concealing and misleading effects. We also highlight gaps in our understanding of these antipredator strategies, and suggest possible methodologies for experimental designs/test subjects (i.e. prey and/or predators) and future research directionsen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipSingapore Ministry of Educationen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)en_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 4 January 2024en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/brv.13044
dc.identifier.grantnumberA-0008516-00-00en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumber31872229en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumber31801979en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumber32270531en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/134830
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0001-7768-3426 (Stevens, Martin)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWiley / Cambridge Philosophical Societyen_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder embargo until 4 January 2025 in compliance with publisher policyen_GB
dc.rights© 2024 Cambridge Philosophical Society
dc.subjectantipredationen_GB
dc.subjectbehaviouren_GB
dc.subjectcamouflageen_GB
dc.subjectcrypsisen_GB
dc.subjectmotionen_GB
dc.titleAntipredator defences in motion: animals reduce predation risks by concealing or misleading motion signalsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2023-12-19T14:26:09Z
dc.identifier.issn1469-185X
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Wiley via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalBiological Reviewsen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-12-15
dcterms.dateSubmitted2022-12-01
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2023-12-15
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2023-12-19T11:57:25Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record