dc.contributor.author | Tan, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Zhang, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Stevens, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Li, D | |
dc.contributor.author | Tan, EJ | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-12-19T14:26:09Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024-01-04 | |
dc.date.updated | 2023-12-19T11:57:22Z | |
dc.description.abstract | Motion is a crucial part of the natural world, yet our understanding of how animals avoid
predation whilst moving remains rather limited. Although several theories have been
proposed for how antipredator defence may be facilitated during motion, there is often a lack
of supporting empirical evidence, or conflicting findings. Furthermore, many studies have
shown that motion often ‘breaks’ camouflage, as sudden movement can be detected even
before an individual is recognised. Whilst some static camouflage strategies may conceal
moving animals to a certain extent, more emphasis should be given to other modes of
camouflage and related defences in the context of motion (e.g. flicker fusion camouflage,
active motion camouflage, motion dazzle, and protean motion). Furthermore, when motion is
involved, defence strategies are not necessarily limited to concealment. An animal can also
rely on motion to mislead predators with regards to its trajectory, location, size, colour
pattern, or even identity. In this review, we discuss the various underlying antipredator
strategies and the mechanisms through which they may be linked to motion, conceptualising
existing empirical and theoretical studies from two perspectives – concealing and misleading
effects. We also highlight gaps in our understanding of these antipredator strategies, and
suggest possible methodologies for experimental designs/test subjects (i.e. prey and/or
predators) and future research directions | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Singapore Ministry of Education | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Published online 4 January 2024 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/brv.13044 | |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | A-0008516-00-00 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | 31872229 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | 31801979 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | 32270531 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/134830 | |
dc.identifier | ORCID: 0000-0001-7768-3426 (Stevens, Martin) | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Wiley / Cambridge Philosophical Society | en_GB |
dc.rights.embargoreason | Under embargo until 4 January 2025 in compliance with publisher policy | en_GB |
dc.rights | © 2024 Cambridge Philosophical Society | |
dc.subject | antipredation | en_GB |
dc.subject | behaviour | en_GB |
dc.subject | camouflage | en_GB |
dc.subject | crypsis | en_GB |
dc.subject | motion | en_GB |
dc.title | Antipredator defences in motion: animals reduce predation risks by concealing or misleading motion signals | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2023-12-19T14:26:09Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1469-185X | |
dc.description | This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Wiley via the DOI in this record | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | Biological Reviews | en_GB |
dc.rights.uri | http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2023-12-15 | |
dcterms.dateSubmitted | 2022-12-01 | |
rioxxterms.version | AM | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2023-12-15 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2023-12-19T11:57:25Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | AM | |
refterms.panel | A | en_GB |