Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBethune, RM
dc.contributor.authorBall, S
dc.contributor.authorDoran, N
dc.contributor.authorHarris, M
dc.contributor.authorMedina-Lara, A
dc.contributor.authorFornasiero, M
dc.contributor.authorHill, M
dc.contributor.authorLang, I
dc.contributor.authorMcGregor-Harper, J
dc.contributor.authorSheaff, R
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-02T13:18:07Z
dc.date.issued2023-09-03
dc.date.updated2024-01-02T11:06:45Z
dc.description.abstractObjectives Safety culture surveys have been widely used in healthcare for more than two decades predominantly as a tool for measuring the level of safety culture (as defined as the beliefs and attitudes that staff express about how their organisation ought to work and how it does in fact work). However, there is the potential for the survey process itself to influence the safety culture and working practices in departments and organisations. The objective of this study was to identify the mechanism by which these changes might occur. Design, setting and participants Mixed methods combining qualitative semi-structured interviews and quantitative scores from patient safety surveys. This evaluation was conducted across general practice, community and acute hospitals in two NHS regions in England; South West and Greater Manchester. The study was undertaken between 2015 and 2018 during the implementation of a series of Patient Safety Collaboratives. Safety, Communication, Operational Reliability, and Engagement (SCORE) surveys were administered in 15 units, followed by a staff debriefing and a second SCORE survey. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with clinicians (n=61). Results from the first and second surveys were compared in order to test for differences in responses. Sixty-one semi-structured interviews were conducted across participating units and thematically analysed.  Analysis and results Results from the first and second surveys were compared using chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests. Sixty-one semi-structured interviews were conducted across participating units and thematically analysed.  There was little change in responses between the first and second SCORE surveys. Within general practice there was some improvement in responses in three survey domains; however, these differences were not conclusive. The qualitative interview data demonstrated a beneficial effect on safety culture. Staff stated that the survey debriefings created a new safe space where problems could be discussed and improvement plans created.  Conclusions Safety culture surveys can improve safety culture within departments if they are followed by a process that includes debriefing the staff and working with them to develop improvement plans.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute for Health Researchen_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 15, No. 9, article e44603en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.44603
dc.identifier.grantnumberPR-R11-0914-12002en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/134871
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-1855-0639 (Bethune, Rob M)
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-9937-4832 (Ball, Sue)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSpringeren_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37795070en_GB
dc.rights© Copyright 2023 Bethune et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CCBY 4.0., which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en_GB
dc.subjectcultureen_GB
dc.subjecthealth policy makingen_GB
dc.subjectqualitativeen_GB
dc.subjectqualitative semi-structured interviewsen_GB
dc.subjectqualitative studiesen_GB
dc.subjectsafetyen_GB
dc.subjectsurveysen_GB
dc.titleHow safety culture surveys influence the quality and safety of healthcare organisationsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2024-01-02T13:18:07Z
dc.identifier.issn2168-8184
exeter.article-numbere44603
exeter.place-of-publicationUnited States
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available from Springer via the DOI in this record. en_GB
dc.identifier.journalCureus: Journal of Medical Scienceen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-08-10
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2023-09-03
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2024-01-02T13:14:19Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2024-01-02T13:18:17Z
refterms.panelAen_GB
refterms.dateFirstOnline2023-09-03


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© Copyright 2023
Bethune et al. This is an open access
article distributed under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License CCBY 4.0., which permits unrestricted use,
distribution, and reproduction in any
medium, provided the original author and
source are credited.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © Copyright 2023 Bethune et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CCBY 4.0., which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.