Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCollins, R
dc.contributor.authorMartyr, A
dc.contributor.authorHunt, A
dc.contributor.authorQuinn, C
dc.contributor.authorPentecost, C
dc.contributor.authorHughes, JC
dc.contributor.authorClare, L
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-02T13:39:32Z
dc.date.issued2023-12-11
dc.date.updated2024-01-02T11:42:32Z
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The perspectives of people with moderate-to-severe dementia are rarely directly elicited in research studies. OBJECTIVES: This systematic review will explore methods and approaches for including the perspectives and preferences of people with moderate-to-severe dementia in research. METHODS: AgeLine, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, PubMed, Social Policy and Practice and Web of Science were searched until June 16 2022. Study quality was assessed using the 16-item Quality Assessment Tool. We described specific communication tools, reviewed the evidence for their effectiveness and considered their strengths and limitations. We examined the more general communication skills and techniques applied to support the use of these tools using thematic synthesis. The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO CRD42019130386 and the review was conducted and reported according to PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: Seven studies reported in 11 publications were included. In these studies five specific communication tools were used: Talking Mats, Augmentative and Alternative Communication Flexiboard, generic photographs in combination with a preference placement board, consultation ballot and personalised communication prescriptions. Each tool identified had advantages and disadvantages depending on dementia severity, verbal or physical ability, expense, researcher training requirements and ease of use. Thematic synthesis identified five general approaches to optimising communication that were employed to support use of the tools: ensuring conversations are individual and person-centred, managing external influences, engaging others, creating structure and facilitation skills. CONCLUSION: All tools had some utility and there was no clear evidence to support the recommendation of any one specific tool; therefore, researchers are advised to select the tool most appropriate to their context. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The findings offer general guidance for researchers and practitioners on how to facilitate communication with people with moderate-to-severe dementia.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEconomic and Social Research Council (ESRC)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipAlzheimer’s Societyen_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 19(1), article e12594en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/opn.12594
dc.identifier.grantnumberES/L001853/2en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumber348, AS-PR2-16-001en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/134873
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-1702-8902 (Martyr, Anthony)
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0003-2048-5538 (Pentecost, Claire)
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-3740-5162 | 0000-0003-3989-5318 (Clare, Linda)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWileyen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38084053en_GB
dc.rights© 2023 The Authors. International Journal of Older People Nursing published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_GB
dc.subjectAlzheimer's diseaseen_GB
dc.subjectcommunicationen_GB
dc.subjectconversationen_GB
dc.subjectinterviewen_GB
dc.titleMethods and approaches to facilitate inclusion of the views, perspectives and preferences of people with moderate-to-severe dementia in research: A narrative systematic reviewen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2024-01-02T13:39:32Z
dc.identifier.issn1748-3735
exeter.place-of-publicationEngland
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Wiley via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionData availability statement: The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1748-3743
dc.identifier.journalInternational Journal of Older People Nursingen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-11-27
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2023-12-11
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2024-01-02T13:37:15Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2024-01-02T13:39:36Z
refterms.panelAen_GB
refterms.dateFirstOnline2023-12-11


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2023 The Authors. International Journal of Older People Nursing published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2023 The Authors. International Journal of Older People Nursing published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.