Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJones, A
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-17T14:49:51Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-12
dc.date.updated2024-01-17T13:55:26Z
dc.description.abstractUnlike for other forms of qualitative data, examples of how fieldnotes are analysed are rarely provided in the literature. Using fieldnotes from my ethnographic study of the production of public space on London's South Bank as a starting point, this paper considers why this might be the case. In particular, the paper argues that for fieldnote-based research, analysis is a feature of note-taking, rather than a discrete phase of activity conducted using our fieldnotes once they have been collected. In this vein, the paper encourages researchers to be aware of the analytical in their fieldnotes, and to be open to the ways that analysis inside the notebook can help us identify salient objects of enquiry in our work.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEconomic and Social Research Council (ESRC)en_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 12 January 2024en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/area.12920
dc.identifier.grantnumberPTA-030-2002-00245en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/135043
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-4933-4023 (Jones, Alasdair)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWiley / Royal Geographical Society / Institute of British Geographersen_GB
dc.rights© 2024 The Authors. Area published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers). This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_GB
dc.subjectethnographyen_GB
dc.subjectfieldnotesen_GB
dc.subjectLondonen_GB
dc.subjectpublic spaceen_GB
dc.subjectqualitative methodsen_GB
dc.subjectUKen_GB
dc.subjecturban geographyen_GB
dc.titleFieldnotes as never really ‘raw’ data: Analysing the social life of public space on London's South Banken_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2024-01-17T14:49:51Z
dc.identifier.issn0004-0894
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Wiley via the DOI in this record. en_GB
dc.descriptionData availability statement: Owing to the consenting process for the fieldwork described in this paper, research data referred to in this paper cannot be shared.en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1475-4762
dc.identifier.journalAreaen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofArea
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-12-13
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2024-01-12
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2024-01-17T14:46:15Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2024-01-17T14:49:55Z
refterms.panelCen_GB
refterms.dateFirstOnline2024-01-12


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2024 The Authors. Area published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers).

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2024 The Authors. Area published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers). This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.