Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFitzpatrick, NK
dc.contributor.authorChachay, V
dc.contributor.authorCapra, S
dc.contributor.authorBriskey, D
dc.contributor.authorJackman, S
dc.contributor.authorShore, A
dc.contributor.authorBowtell, J
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-22T10:47:35Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-15
dc.date.updated2024-01-21T21:14:55Z
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Chronic exposure of the macula to blue light from electronic devices has been identified as a potential macular health concern. The impacts remain poorly investigated as no validated methods to capture usual device use behaviours exist. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to develop and validate the Electronic Device Use Questionnaire (EDUQ) against multiple 24-h electronic device use diaries in healthy Australian and United Kingdom adults. METHODS: The EDUQ and diaries were developed to capture device use across categories (television, computer and handheld devices). Over eight weeks 56 Australian and 24 United Kingdom participants completed three questionnaires and eight diaries via online platforms. Tool validity was determined through Bland-Altman plot analysis of mean daily hours of device use between the tools. RESULTS: The EDUQ demonstrated poor validity in both cohorts with poor agreement when compared with the diaries. When the device categories were combined, a mean difference between the tools of 1.54 h/day, and 95% limits of agreement between -2.72 h/day and 5.80 h/day was observed in the Australian cohort. Across both cohorts and all device categories the mean differences indicated individuals were more likely to report higher device use through the questionnaire rather than diaries. CONCLUSIONS: The EDUQ is a novel tool and demonstrated the difficulty for participants of accurately recalling usual behaviour of device use. Poor agreement in reported device use occurred across all device categories. The poor agreement may be related to factors such as memory recall bias, and the number of diaries captured not being reflective of usual use. Future studies should look to address these factors to improve validity of device use capture.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipQUEX Instituteen_GB
dc.format.extent186-
dc.format.mediumElectronic
dc.identifier.citationVol. 24(1), article 186en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-17637-4
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/135081
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-4281-9212 (Bowtell, Joanna)
dc.identifierScopusID: 6602808377 (Bowtell, Joanna)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherBMCen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.48610/61b97b1en_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38225654en_GB
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2024. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecom mons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.en_GB
dc.subjectBlue lighten_GB
dc.subjectMacular degenerationen_GB
dc.subjectQuestionnaire designsen_GB
dc.subjectScreen timeen_GB
dc.subjectSurvey methodsen_GB
dc.titleAssessing electronic device use behaviours in healthy adults: development and evaluation of a novel toolen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2024-01-22T10:47:35Z
dc.identifier.issn1471-2458
exeter.article-number186
exeter.place-of-publicationEngland
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from BMC via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionAvailability of data and materials: The dataset supporting the conclusions of this article is available in the UQeSpace repository, https://doi.org/10.48610/61b97b1en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1471-2458
dc.identifier.journalBMC Public Healthen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Public Health, 24(1)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2024-01-01
dc.rights.licenseCC BY
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2024-01-15
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2024-01-22T10:46:09Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2024-01-22T10:47:40Z
refterms.panelAen_GB
refterms.dateFirstOnline2024-01-15


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© The Author(s) 2024. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which 
permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the 
original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or 
other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line 
to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory 
regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this 
licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecom mons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © The Author(s) 2024. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecom mons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.