Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorField, E
dc.contributor.authorGhosh, A
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-25T15:44:31Z
dc.date.issued2023-09-02
dc.date.updated2024-01-25T14:57:46Z
dc.description.abstractGlobally, greenhouse gas emissions from the operational phase of buildings are significantly contributing towards climate change. Global and national efforts, through the Sustainable Development Goals and the UK's 2050 targets, aim to reduce these emissions with net zero energy buildings (NZEBs). A building's glazing plays a significant role in overall building energy consumption due to their traditionally ‘leaky’ nature. This study utilises experimental data from test cells and the International Glazing Database to evaluate the performance of advanced and smart/switchable windows on an existing low energy building (LEB) situated in north Wales, UK, as a step towards making the modelled building a NZEB. A number of glazing constructions were considered in this work; advanced window – vacuum, aerogel, vacuum-aerogel and smart window – PDLC, PDLC-aerogel and PDLC-vacuum, in their fixed and switching states. Results revealed that PDLC-vacuum offered the greatest reduction in building energy, yielding a theoretical U-value of 0.810–0.831 W/m2K and a G-value of 0.257–0.455. Despite its successes, it was notably susceptible to window orientation and window-to-wall ratio. Vacuum and aerogel glazing both offered similar energy savings, with the latter prone to overheating, stressing cooling loads. These advanced windows offered differing daylighting potential with vacuum able to meet 78% of useful daylight illuminance compared to aerogel's 60%. Given the prioritisation trilemma between heating, lighting and cooling needs of a building, PDLC-vacuum presents the best step towards a NZEB. As such, further efforts should concentrate on the development of a PDLC-vacuum window, maintaining smart window functionality and achieving low U-value for cold climates.en_GB
dc.format.extent128999-
dc.identifier.citationVol. 283, article 128999en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.128999
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/135135
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0001-9409-7592 (Ghosh, Aritra)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevieren_GB
dc.rights© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_GB
dc.subjectSmart windowen_GB
dc.subjectAerogelen_GB
dc.subjectVacuumen_GB
dc.subjectGlazingen_GB
dc.subjectUKen_GB
dc.subjectBuildingen_GB
dc.subjectEnergyPlusen_GB
dc.subjectPDLCen_GB
dc.titleEnergy assessment of advanced and switchable windows for less energy-hungry buildings in the UKen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2024-01-25T15:44:31Z
dc.identifier.issn0360-5442
exeter.article-number128999
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Elsevier via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionData availability: Data will be made available on request.en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1873-6785
dc.identifier.journalEnergyen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofEnergy, 283
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-09-02
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2023-09-02
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2024-01-25T15:43:04Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2024-01-25T15:44:38Z
refterms.panelBen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).