Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorvan der Heijden, I
dc.contributor.authorWest, S
dc.contributor.authorMonteyne, AJ
dc.contributor.authorFinnigan, TJA
dc.contributor.authorAbdelrahman, DR
dc.contributor.authorMurton, AJ
dc.contributor.authorStephens, FB
dc.contributor.authorWall, BT
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-29T14:16:49Z
dc.date.issued2023-09-15
dc.date.updated2024-01-29T13:56:05Z
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Spirulina [SPIR] (cyanobacterium) and chlorella [CHLO] (microalgae) are foods rich in protein and essential amino acids; however, their capacity to stimulate myofibrillar protein synthesis (MyoPS) in humans remains unknown. OBJECTIVES: We assessed the impact of ingesting SPIR and CHLO compared with an established high-quality nonanimal-derived dietary protein source (fungal-derived mycoprotein [MYCO]) on plasma amino acid concentrations, as well as resting and postexercise MyoPS rates in young adults. METHODS: Thirty-six healthy young adults (age: 22 ± 3 y; BMI: 23 ± 3 kg·m-2; male [m]/female [f], 18/18) participated in a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial. Participants received a primed, continuous infusion of L-[ring-2H5]-phenylalanine and completed a bout of unilateral-resistance leg exercise before ingesting a drink containing 25 g protein from MYCO (n = 12; m/f, 6/6), SPIR (n = 12; m/f, 6/6), or CHLO (n = 12; m/f, 6/6). Blood and bilateral muscle samples were collected at baseline and during a 4-h postprandial and postexercise period to assess the plasma amino acid concentrations and MyoPS rates in rested and exercised tissue. RESULTS: Protein ingestion increased the plasma total and essential amino acid concentrations (time effects; all P < 0.001), but most rapidly and with higher peak responses following the ingestion of SPIR compared with MYCO and CHLO (P < 0.05), and MYCO compared with CHLO (P < 0.05). Protein ingestion increased MyoPS rates (time effect; P < 0.001) in both rested (MYCO, from 0.041 ± 0.032 to 0.060 ± 0.015%·h-1; SPIR, from 0.042 ± 0.030 to 0.066 ± 0.022%·h-1; and CHLO, from 0.037 ± 0.007 to 0.055 ± 0.019%·h-1, respectively) and exercised tissue (MYCO, from 0.046 ± 0.014 to 0.092 ± 0.024%·h-1; SPIR, from 0.038 ± 0.011 to 0.086 ± 0.028%·h-1; and CHLO, from 0.048 ± 0.019 to 0.090 ± 0.024%·h-1, respectively), with no differences between groups (interaction effect; P > 0.05), but with higher rates in exercised compared with rested muscle (time × exercise effect; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The ingestion of a single bolus of algae-derived SPIR and CHLO increases resting and postexercise MyoPS rates to a comparable extent as MYCO, despite divergent postprandial plasma amino acid responses.en_GB
dc.format.extent3406-3417
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.identifier.citationVol. 153(12), pp. 3406-3417en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjnut.2023.08.035
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/135198
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0001-7338-0428 (Monteyne, Alistair J)
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0001-6312-5351 (Stephens, Francis B)
dc.identifierScopusID: 12779890700 (Stephens, Francis B)
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-6019-6709 (Wall, Benjamin T)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevier / American Society for Nutritionen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37716611en_GB
dc.rights© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Society for Nutrition. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_GB
dc.subjectalgaeen_GB
dc.subjectamino acidsen_GB
dc.subjectmuscle protein synthesisen_GB
dc.subjectmycoproteinen_GB
dc.subjectresistance exerciseen_GB
dc.subjectstable isotopesen_GB
dc.titleAlgae Ingestion Increases Resting and Exercised Myofibrillar Protein Synthesis Rates to a Similar Extent as Mycoprotein in Young Adultsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2024-01-29T14:16:49Z
dc.identifier.issn0022-3166
exeter.place-of-publicationUnited States
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Elsevier via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionData availability: Data described in the manuscript may be made available upon request, pending application.en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1541-6100
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Nutritionen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofJ Nutr, 153(12)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-08-31
dc.rights.licenseCC BY
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2023-09-15
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2024-01-29T14:13:45Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2024-01-29T14:16:58Z
refterms.panelAen_GB
refterms.dateFirstOnline2023-09-15


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Society for Nutrition. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Society for Nutrition. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).