Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLange, I
dc.contributor.authorRazak, TB
dc.contributor.authorPerry, CT
dc.contributor.authorMaulana, PB
dc.contributor.authorPrasetya, ME
dc.contributor.authorIrwan
dc.contributor.authorLamont, TAC
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-12T10:02:17Z
dc.date.issued2024-03-12
dc.date.updated2024-03-11T09:37:46Z
dc.description.abstractRestoration is increasingly seen as a necessary tool to reverse ecological decline across terrestrial and marine ecosystems. Considering the unprecedented loss of coral cover and associated reef ecosystem services, active coral restoration is gaining traction in local management strategies and has recently seen major increases in scale. However, the extent to which coral restoration may restore key reef functions is poorly understood. Carbonate budgets, defined as the balance between calcium carbonate production and erosion, influence a reef’s ability to provide important geo-ecological functions including structural complexity, reef framework production, and vertical accretion. Here we present the first assessment of reef carbonate budget trajectories at restoration sites. The study was conducted at one of the world’s largest coral restoration programs, which transplants healthy coral fragments onto hexagonal metal frames to consolidate degraded rubble fields. Within 4 years, fast coral growth supports a rapid recovery of coral cover (from 17% ± 2% to 56% ± 4%), substrate rugosity (from 1.3 ± 0.1 to 1.7 ± 0.1) and carbonate production (from 7.2 ± 1.6 to 20.7 ± 2.2 kg m−2 yr−1). Four years after coral transplantation, net carbonate budgets have tripled and are indistinguishable from healthy control sites (19.1 ± 3.1 and 18.7 ± 2.2 kg m−2 yr−1, respectively). However, taxa-level contributions to carbonate production differ between restored and healthy reefs due to the preferential use of branching corals for transplantation. While longer observation times are necessary to observe any self-organization ability of restored reefs (natural recruitment, resilience to thermal stress), we demonstrate the potential of large-scale, well-managed coral restoration projects to recover important ecosystem functions within only 4 years.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipFondation Bertarellien_GB
dc.description.sponsorship1851 Royal Commissionen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipFisheries Society of the British Islesen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipBertarelli Program in Marine Scienceen_GB
dc.formatMicrosoft Excel Worksheet
dc.identifier.doi10.24378/exe.5065
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/135531
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0001-9888-2694 (Lange, Ines)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherUniversity of Exeteren_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/135523en_GB
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0en_GB
dc.subjectcoral reefen_GB
dc.subjectcoral reefen_GB
dc.subjectrecoveryen_GB
dc.subjectcoral restorationen_GB
dc.subjectcarbonate budgetsen_GB
dc.subjectReefBudgeten_GB
dc.subjectcoastal protectionen_GB
dc.subjectIndonesiaen_GB
dc.titleCoral restoration can drive rapid reef carbonate budget recovery (dataset)en_GB
dc.typeDataseten_GB
dc.date.available2024-03-12T10:02:17Z
dc.descriptionThis is the raw data used for the Lange et al. (2024) article "Coral restoration can drive rapid reef carbonate budget recovery" published in Current Biology.en_GB
dc.descriptionThe article associated with this dataset is available in ORE at: http://hdl.handle.net/10871/135523en_GB
dc.identifier.journalCurrent Biologyen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0en_GB
rioxxterms.versionNAen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2024-03-12
rioxxterms.typeOtheren_GB
refterms.dateFOA2024-03-12T10:02:22Z


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

CC BY 4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as CC BY 4.0