Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHayward, G
dc.contributor.authorYu, L-M
dc.contributor.authorLittle, P
dc.contributor.authorGbinigie, O
dc.contributor.authorShanyinde, M
dc.contributor.authorHarris, V
dc.contributor.authorDorward, J
dc.contributor.authorSaville, BR
dc.contributor.authorBerry, N
dc.contributor.authorEvans, PH
dc.contributor.authorThomas, NP
dc.contributor.authorPatel, MG
dc.contributor.authorRichards, D
dc.contributor.authorHecke, OV
dc.contributor.authorDetry, MA
dc.contributor.authorSaunders, C
dc.contributor.authorFitzgerald, M
dc.contributor.authorRobinson, J
dc.contributor.authorLatimer-Bell, C
dc.contributor.authorAllen, J
dc.contributor.authorOgburn, E
dc.contributor.authorGrabey, J
dc.contributor.authorde Lusignan, S
dc.contributor.authorHobbs, FR
dc.contributor.authorButler, CC
dc.contributor.authorPRINCIPLE Trial Collaborative Group
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-21T10:24:10Z
dc.date.issued2024-02-29
dc.date.updated2024-03-21T08:42:21Z
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The evidence for whether ivermectin impacts recovery, hospital admissions, and longer-term outcomes in COVID-19 is contested. The WHO recommends its use only in the context of clinical trials. METHODS: In this multicentre, open-label, multi-arm, adaptive platform randomised controlled trial, we included participants aged ≥18 years in the community, with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test, and symptoms lasting ≤14 days. Participants were randomised to usual care, usual care plus ivermectin tablets (target 300-400 μg/kg per dose, once daily for 3 days), or usual care plus other interventions. Co-primary endpoints were time to first self-reported recovery, and COVID-19 related hospitalisation/death within 28 days, analysed using Bayesian models. Recovery at 6 months was the primary, longer term outcome. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN86534580. FINDINGS: The primary analysis included 8811 SARS-CoV-2 positive participants (median symptom duration 5 days), randomised to ivermectin (n=2157), usual care (n=3256), and other treatments (n=3398) from June 23, 2021 to July 1, 2022. Time to self-reported recovery was shorter in the ivermectin group compared with usual care (hazard ratio 1·15 [95% Bayesian credible interval, 1·07 to 1·23], median decrease 2.06 days [1·00 to 3·06]), probability of meaningful effect (pre-specified hazard ratio ≥1.2) 0·192). COVID-19-related hospitalisations/deaths (odds ratio 1·02 [0·63 to 1·62]; estimated percentage difference 0% [-1% to 0·6%]), serious adverse events (three and five respectively), and the proportion feeling fully recovered were similar in both groups at 6 months (74·3% and 71·2% respectively (RR = 1·05, [1·02 to 1·08]) and also at 3 and 12 months.,. INTERPRETATION: Ivermectin for COVID-19 is unlikely to provide clinically meaningful improvement in recovery, hospital admissions, or longer-term outcomes. Further trials of ivermectin for SARS-Cov-2 infection in vaccinated community populations appear unwarranted. FUNDING: UKRI / National Institute of Health Research (MC_PC_19079).en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR)en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 88 (4), article 106130en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106130
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/135596
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-5277-3545 (Evans, Philip H)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevier / The British Infection Associationen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38431155en_GB
dc.rights© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The British Infection Association. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).en_GB
dc.subjectCOVID-19en_GB
dc.subjectIvermectinen_GB
dc.subjectSARS-Cov2en_GB
dc.subjectclincial trialen_GB
dc.subjectlong-term follow upen_GB
dc.titleIvermectin for COVID-19 in adults in the community (PRINCIPLE): an open, randomised, controlled, adaptive platform trial of short- and longer-term outcomesen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2024-03-21T10:24:10Z
dc.identifier.issn0163-4453
exeter.article-number106130
exeter.place-of-publicationEngland
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Elsevier via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1532-2742
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Infectionen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2024-02-22
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2024-02-29
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2024-03-21T10:20:55Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2024-03-21T10:24:27Z
refterms.panelAen_GB
refterms.dateFirstOnline2024-02-29


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The British Infection Association. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The British Infection Association. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).