Support for primary care prescribing for adult ADHD in England: national survey
dc.contributor.author | Price, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Becker, K | |
dc.contributor.author | Ward, JH | |
dc.contributor.author | Ukoumunne, OC | |
dc.contributor.author | Gudka, R | |
dc.contributor.author | Salimi, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Mughal, F | |
dc.contributor.author | Melendez-Torres, GJ | |
dc.contributor.author | Smith, JR | |
dc.contributor.author | Newlove-Delgado, T | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-04-15T14:48:42Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024-04-15 | |
dc.date.updated | 2024-04-15T12:32:49Z | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common neurodevelopmental disorder with effective pharmacological treatments that improve symptoms and reduce complications. NICE guidelines recommend primary care practitioners prescribe medication for adult ADHD under shared care agreements with adult mental health services (AMHS). However, provision remains uneven, with some practitioners reporting a lack of support. Aim: This study aimed to describe supportive elements (prescribing, shared care, AMHS availability) of primary care prescribing for adult ADHD medication in England, to inform service improvement and improve access for this underserved population. Design and Setting: Three interlinked cross-sectional surveys asked every integrated care board (ICB) in England (Commissioners), and convenience samples of healthcare professionals (HP) and people with lived experience (LE), about elements supporting pharmacological treatment of ADHD in primary care. Method: Descriptive analyses used percentages and confidence intervals to summarise responses by stakeholder group. Variations in reported provision and practice were explored and displayed visually using mapping software. Results: Data from 782 respondents (42 Commissioners; 331 HP; 409 LE) revealed differences in reported provision by stakeholder group, including for prescribing (94.6% of HP vs 62.6% of LE). Over 40% of respondents reported extended AMHS waiting times of two years or more. There was some variability by NHS region, for example London had highest rates of HP reported prescribing (100%), and lowest reported extended waiting times (25.0%). Conclusion: Elements supporting appropriate shared care prescribing of ADHD medication via primary care are not universally available in England. Co-ordinated approaches are needed to address these gaps. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) | en_GB |
dc.format.extent | e777-e783 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 74 (748), pp. e777-e783 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2023.0595 | |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | MHF008 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | NIHR300056 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | NIHR300957 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/135752 | |
dc.identifier | ORCID: 0009-0008-6761-0950 (Coniam-Gudka, Rebecca) | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Royal College of General Practitioners | en_GB |
dc.rights | © 2024 The Authors. This article is Open Access: CC BY 4.0 licence (http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/). | en_GB |
dc.subject | ADHD | en_GB |
dc.subject | Primary Health Care | en_GB |
dc.subject | GPs | en_GB |
dc.subject | Survey | en_GB |
dc.subject | Prescribing | en_GB |
dc.subject | Shared Care | en_GB |
dc.title | Support for primary care prescribing for adult ADHD in England: national survey | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2024-04-15T14:48:42Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0960-1643 | |
dc.description | This is the final version. Available on open access from the Royal College of General Practitioners via the DOI in this record | en_GB |
dc.description | Data: Data is stored securely at the University of Exeter and will be made available from the lead author upon reasonable request. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1478-5242 | |
dc.identifier.journal | British Journal of General Practice | en_GB |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2024-04-09 | |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2024-04-09 | |
dcterms.dateSubmitted | 2023-11-14 | |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2024-04-09 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2024-04-15T12:33:02Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | AM | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2024-04-15T14:49:06Z | |
refterms.panel | A | en_GB |
refterms.dateFirstOnline | 2024-04-15 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2024 The Authors. This article is Open Access: CC BY 4.0 licence (http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/).