Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMarshall, J
dc.contributor.authorPapavasiliou, E
dc.contributor.authorFox, C
dc.contributor.authorHawkes, M
dc.contributor.authorIrvine, A
dc.contributor.authorMoniz-Cook, E
dc.contributor.authorPick, A
dc.contributor.authorPolley, MJ
dc.contributor.authorReeve, J
dc.contributor.authorRobinson, L
dc.contributor.authorRook, G
dc.contributor.authorSadler, E
dc.contributor.authorWolverson, E
dc.contributor.authorWalker, S
dc.contributor.authorCross, JL
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-23T13:51:28Z
dc.date.issued2024-04-08
dc.date.updated2024-04-18T13:40:24Z
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: Dementia is a complex medical condition that poses significant challenges to healthcare systems and support services. People living with dementia (PLWD) and their carers experience complex needs often exacerbated by social isolation and challenges in accessing support. Social prescribing (SP) seeks to enable PLWD and their carers to access community and voluntary sector resources to support them address such needs. Existing research, however, does not describe what SP interventions are currently in place in dementia care. Little is known about the needs these interventions are designed to address, the reasons that lead PLWD and their carers to participate in them, their effectiveness and the extent to which they could increase positive health outcomes if adopted and how. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A complex intervention systematic review of SP for PLWD and/or their carers will be conducted using an iterative logic model approach. Six electronic (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus and Cochrane/CENTRAL) and two grey literature databases (EThOS and CORE) were searched for publications between 1 January 2003 and June 2023, supplemented by handsearching of reference lists of included studies. Study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment, using Gough's Weight of Evidence Framework, will be independently performed by two reviewers. A narrative approach will be employed to synthesise and report quantitative and qualitative data. Reporting will be informed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Complex Interventions extension statement and checklist. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical approval is required due to this systematic review operating only with secondary sources. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and meetings with key stakeholders including healthcare professionals, patient and carer groups, community organisations (eg, the Social Prescribing Network and the Evidence Collaborative at the National Academy for Social Prescribing), policymakers and funding bodies. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023428625.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR)en_GB
dc.format.extente080551-
dc.format.mediumElectronic
dc.identifier.citationVol. 14(4), article e080551en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080551
dc.identifier.grantnumberNIHR203280en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/135796
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0001-9480-5704 (Fox, Chris)
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0003-4201-1093 (Walker, Sarah)
dc.identifierScopusID: 15051966100 | 57198868753 (Walker, Sarah)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38589260en_GB
dc.rights© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dc.titleSocial prescribing for people living with dementia (PLWD) and their carers: what works, for whom, under what circumstances and why - protocol for a complex intervention systematic reviewen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2024-04-23T13:51:28Z
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
exeter.place-of-publicationEngland
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from BMJ Publishing Group via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalBMJ Openen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofBMJ Open, 14(4)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2024-03-13
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2024-04-08
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2024-04-23T13:49:01Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2024-04-23T13:51:33Z
refterms.panelAen_GB
refterms.dateFirstOnline2024-04-08


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. 
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/