Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMerriel, SWD
dc.contributor.authorButtle, P
dc.contributor.authorPrice, SJ
dc.contributor.authorBurns-Cox, N
dc.contributor.authorWalter, FM
dc.contributor.authorHamilton, W
dc.contributor.authorSpencer, AE
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-02T13:25:07Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.date.updated2024-07-02T10:29:58Z
dc.description.abstractTo explore the potential impacts of incorporating pre-biopsy magnetic resonance imaging into primary care as a triage test within the prostate cancer diagnostic pathway. Subjects and methods Decision analytic modelling with decision trees was utilised for this early economic evaluation. A conceptual model was developed reflecting the common primary care routes to diagnosis for prostate cancer; opportunistic, asymptomatic Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) screening or symptomatic presentation. The use of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) or biparametric MRI (bpMRI) as a primary care triage test following an elevated PSA result was evaluated. A health system perspective was adopted with a time horizon of 12 months. Health effects were expressed in terms of utilities drawn from the literature. The primary outcome was prostate cancer diagnosis. Evidence used to inform the model was drawn from published primary studies, systematic reviews, and secondary analyses of primary and secondary care datasets. Results Base-case analysis showed that the PSA pathway was dominated by both mpMRI- and bpMRI-based pathways for patients undergoing opportunistic screening and symptomatic assessment. bpMRI pathways had greater improvement in cost and utility than mpMRI pathways in both clinical scenarios. Significantly more MRI scans would be performed using the modelled approach (66,626 scans vs 37,456 scans per 100,000 patients per annum), with fewer subsequent urgent suspected cancer referrals for both mpMRI (38% reduction for screening and symptomatic patients) and bpMRI (72% reduction for screening; 71% for symptomatic) pathways, and a small increase in number of missed cancer diagnoses. Deterministic sensitivity analyses, varying each parameter to its upper and lower 95% confidence intervals, showed no significant change in the dominance of the MRI-based prostate cancer diagnostic pathways. Conclusion Using prostate MRI as a second-level triage test for suspected prostate cancer in primary care could reduce health service costs without a detrimental effect on patient utilityen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipCancer Research UKen_GB
dc.identifier.citationAwaiting citation and DOIen_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberC8640/A23385en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberC56843/A21550en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/136540
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-8163-3103 (Spencer, Anne)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWileyen_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder temporary indefinite embargo pending publication by Wiley.  No embargo required on publication. AAM to be replaced with published version on publication en_GB
dc.subjectProstate canceren_GB
dc.subjectdiagnosisen_GB
dc.subjectprimary careen_GB
dc.subjectmpMRIen_GB
dc.subjectbpMRIen_GB
dc.subjectearly economic evaluationen_GB
dc.titleEarly economic evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer detection in primary careen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2024-07-02T13:25:07Z
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript.en_GB
dc.descriptionData availability statement: Data used for this model from published papers are freely available to access. CPRD data from the CRUK IMPACT study and South-West Peninsula Cancer Alliance Prostate Cancer Dashboard data are not publicly available; any requests for access should be made to SJP and NBC respectivelyen_GB
dc.identifier.eissn2688-4526
dc.identifier.journalBJUI Compassen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofBJUI Compass
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2024-06-18
dcterms.dateSubmitted2024-06-25
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2024-06-18
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2024-07-02T10:30:01Z
refterms.versionFCDP
refterms.panelAen_GB
exeter.rights-retention-statementNo


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record